- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 15:05:46 -0400
- To: RDFa Working Group WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
On 10/28/2010 02:51 PM, Nathan wrote: > okay we all agree, great. > Issue closed as void. Yikes! Don't close issues in the ISSUE tracker without a PROPOSAL to the mailing list followed by no objections to the given proposal. The issue wasn't void - we needed to have that discussion and record the outcome of the discussion in a formal way. At a minimum, Mark hasn't had a chance to chime in yet and neither has the public. Just because you raised the issue and feel that it has been dealt with doesn't mean that it's dealt with. :) In general, once an issue is in the ISSUE tracker, we have to go through the process and address the issue as a Working Group. Just because the majority of people in the RDFa WG agree that this is the right direction doesn't mean that the general public doesn't know something that could affect that direction. At a minimum, we should give people a PROPOSAL and a minimum of 7 days to send in objections before closing ISSUEs. -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: Saving Journalism - The PaySwarm Developer API http://digitalbazaar.com/2010/09/12/payswarm-api/
Received on Thursday, 28 October 2010 19:06:20 UTC