- From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2010 21:11:29 +0100
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
On Sun, 03 Oct 2010 13:21:27 -0400 Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: > Please comment in 7 days from this post if you object to this > proposal. If there are no objections within 7 days, ISSUE-17 will be > closed. I think there's still an issue, but an issue at the PFWG side. Namely, that the current wording of the role attribute draft makes it seem like it's placing normative requirements on XHTML+RDFa and HTML+RDFa processors. -- Toby A Inkster <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
Received on Sunday, 3 October 2010 20:12:32 UTC