W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > October 2010

Re: [Fwd: ACTION-487 Assess potential impact of IRI draft on RDF/XML, OWL, and Turtle]

From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 09:54:26 +0100
To: nathan@webr3.org
Cc: RDFA Working Group <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20101028095426.2eef09df@miranda.g5n.co.uk>
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 03:13:39 +0100
Nathan <nathan@webr3.org> wrote:

> Similarly, 'RDFa in XHTML' does not define 'URI reference' and the
> reasonable assumption would be that these are inherited from RDF
> Concepts or 3986.
> Unfortunately RDFa has a definition  of CURIEs that normatively
> references RFC 3987.

We should probably seek guidance from TAG regarding what normative
reference to include for URIs/IRIs, as I assume they know the landscape
and can guess what direction other XML/HTML/RDF-related specs are
headed better than anyone on this WG can.

Toby A Inkster
Received on Thursday, 28 October 2010 08:54:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:05:22 UTC