Just a small remark on that On Oct 5, 2010, at 23:43 , Richard Cyganiak wrote: > >> Even if those concerns didn't apply to terms at all, I still think >> there is value in keeping term mappings as-is for consistency >> with prefix mappings. > > I have not weighed in on the question of expressing prefix mappings in RDFa, because I don't consider that question critical. I would be happy with either option -- keep them as is, or change them along with the term mappings. Whatever finds consensus. > This is a side issue, but I think it would be bad to have different syntaxes for term and prefix mappings. They should follow the same design in my view. Ivan > Best, > Richard > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/wiki/ProfileSpec > > >> >> -- >> Toby A Inkster >> <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> >> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk> >> > > -- > Linked Data Technologist • Linked Data Research Centre > Digital Enterprise Research Institute (DERI), NUI Galway, Ireland > http://linkeddata.deri.ie/ > skype:richard.cyganiak > tel:+353-91-49-5711 > ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Wednesday, 6 October 2010 07:30:44 UTC