Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-16: RDF Collections

On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 06:49:54 -0200
Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:

> I do not agree with the argument that this is RDF Next WG's work (and
> I do not think it will be part of the charter). Collections is well
> specified in RDF and there is no reason to come back to them right
> now. 

FWIW, I'd welcome an easy way to represent rdf:List structures in RDFa.

Shortcuts for rdf:{Bag,Seq,Alt} I'm not so concerned about - they're
not especially difficult to represent anyway.

I do have some concerns with Ivan's proposed method as it involves
modifying the DOM during a preprocessing step. But if someone could find
a way to implement it as part of the current one-pass parse, then I'd
be in favour.

-- 
Toby A Inkster
<mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk>
<http://tobyinkster.co.uk>