Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: is _ a special prefix? or a URI?

On Oct 4, 2010, at 13:43 , Shane McCarron wrote:

> 
> 
> On 10/4/2010 6:44 AM, Ivan Herman wrote:
>> ....
>> The text says "the following triples will be generated" which is wrong. At the minimum, the 'will' should be a 'may', but it is better if the generated triples explicitly do _not_ use the same blank node identifiers, ie, something like
>> 
>> _:xyz foaf:mbox<mailto:john@example.org>  .
>> _:abc foaf:mbox<mailto:sue@example.org>  .
>> _:xyz foaf:knows _:abc .
>> 
>> with an extra comment that draws attention on the fact that different bnode identifiers may be used on output.
> 
> How about 'Triples similar to the following will be generated:' ?

That is fine with me but not with _:john and _:sue. That is very misleading.

Ivan

> 
> -- 
> Shane P. McCarron                          Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
> Managing Director                            Fax: +1 763 786-8180
> ApTest Minnesota                            Inet: shane@aptest.com
> 
> 


----
Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf

Received on Monday, 4 October 2010 12:09:37 UTC