- From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 19:22:24 -0400
- To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- CC: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 18 October 2010 23:23:55 UTC
On Oct 18, 2010, at 2:02 PM, Shane McCarron wrote: * I note that the format declares a prefix dcterms: http://purl.org/dc/terms/ whereas the body of the document uses dc: ttp://purl.org/dc/terms/. This is, of course, correct, but somewhat inconsistent. Actually, I think we use dcterms: everywhere. I could not find the string 'dc:' in the source. Check out Section 2. Syntax Overview: http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-core/#s_Syntax_overview For brevity, in the following examples and throughout this document, assume that the following vocabulary prefixes have been defined: bibo: http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/ cc: http://creativecommons.org/ns# dbp: http://dbpedia.org/property/ dbr: http://dbpedia.org/resource/ dc: http://purl.org/dc/terms/ ex: http://example.org/ foaf: http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/ rdf: http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns# rdfa: http://www.w3.org/ns/rdfa# rdfs: http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema# xhv: http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/vocab# xsd: http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema# Is there a newer draft where it's been changed? Gregg
Received on Monday, 18 October 2010 23:23:55 UTC