Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-39: RDFa term mapping triples

Shane McCarron wrote:
> On 10/5/2010 11:05 AM, Toby Inkster wrote:
>> ....
>> Also, I think ideally the range of rdfa:uri should be xsd:string, not
>> xsd:anyURI. This is because CURIE prefix expansions could theoretically
>> be too truncated to be legal URIs until the suffix is added.
> 
> I agree with this.
> 

likewise agreed.

ps: think there will be a request to change it to xsd:arbitraryString ?

Received on Tuesday, 5 October 2010 17:10:42 UTC