W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > October 2010

Re: RDFa Core, section 4.2

From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2010 10:10:52 -0500
Message-ID: <4CAC917C.6000300@aptest.com>
To: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
CC: RDFA Working Group <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
  Hmm... I guess it should really say 'should be placed in no namespace 
or in the namespace of the host language'.  The point is that it should 
NOT be in the XHTML namespace, since that makes it icky to use.

On 10/6/2010 10:08 AM, Toby Inkster wrote:
> Something smells wrong here:
>> If the Host Language uses XML Namespaces [XML-NAMES], the attributes
>> in this specification should be incorporated in the namespace of the
>> Host Language.
> No existing host language does this.
> XHTML+RDFa, HTML5+RDFa, SVG and Yahoo's DataRSS all use unnamespaced
> attributes for RDFa. OpenDocument 1.2 is a bit of an exception, as it
> places the RDFa attributes in the<http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml>
> namespace, which not even XHTML does.

Shane P. McCarron                          Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
Managing Director                            Fax: +1 763 786-8180
ApTest Minnesota                            Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Wednesday, 6 October 2010 15:12:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:05:21 UTC