- From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 21:45:07 +0100
- To: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- CC: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Toby Inkster wrote: > How about: > > """ > After processing, the following triples will be generated: > > _:john foaf:mbox <mailto:john@example.org> . > _:sue foaf:mbox <mailto:sue@example.org> . > _:john foaf:knows _:sue . > > The blank node identifiers ("_:john" and "_:sue") are arbitrary and > implementations are not required to maintain the same identifiers as > occur in the RDFa markup. The above data could have equivalently been > represented as: > > _:a foaf:mbox <mailto:john@example.org> . > _:b foaf:mbox <mailto:sue@example.org> . > _:a foaf:knows _:b . > > For clarity, this document retains blank node identifiers in examples, > but developers must not rely on RDFa implementations returning > identifiers that are consistent with the RDFa markup. > """ > +1 from me - perfectly clear imho
Received on Tuesday, 19 October 2010 20:46:03 UTC