W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > October 2010

Re: Volunteers needed to review XHTML+RDFa 1.1

From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:16:02 -0500
Message-ID: <4CC993B2.8050106@aptest.com>
To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
CC: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Note that when you are reviewing this document, the implementation 
appendices have some datatypes that are inconsistent with the prose.  I 
have these updated in the real source, but I don't want to mess up your 
review so I am not pushing them to the server.  I will do so (obviously) 
before we produce a last call draft.


On 10/26/2010 4:36 PM, Manu Sporny wrote:
> On 10/26/2010 03:47 PM, Thomas Steiner wrote:
>> Slightly hesitantly raising my hand. Not sure if the call is directed
>> to people outside of the WG. If need be, I have the time to review the
>> document. I might not be the most experienced reviewer, though. I
>> played a lot with the practical side o the RDFa API in the last couple
>> of weeks. As I said, volunteering slightly hesitantly, but
>> passionatly. Just let me know…
> Going once... going twice...
> SOLD to the passionate man slightly, hesitantly raising his hand! :)
> We now have two reviewers - Thomas Steiner has volunteered as well as
> Knud Möller.
> Ideally, we like to have reviews from people that have never reviewed
> the document before - you're perfectly suited for the job at hand.
> Thanks for stepping forward, Thomas! The document is going to be a bit
> overwhelming if you haven't already read the RDFa Core document, but
> this may be a good test to see whether or not you can make sense of it.
> There is also quite a bit of RelaxNG and XHTML Drivers and Modules in
> there. Don't feel that you have to learn that stuff to do the review as
> it's merely meant to formalize the text in the spec and not much of it
> has changed since XHTML+RDFa 1.0.
> In any case, we welcome your feedback.
> If you could get your comments in by this coming Saturday, that would be
> great. We are going to try to see if we want to take XHTML+RDFa 1.1 to
> Last Call during the November 4th 2010 telecon, with a publication date
> of November 9th 2010. It would be best if Shane had a set of comments to
> work with by this weekend. That said, we are at the mercy of your and
> Knud's schedule, so as soon as you can do a review would be great.
> -- manu

Shane P. McCarron                          Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
Managing Director                            Fax: +1 763 786-8180
ApTest Minnesota                            Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Thursday, 28 October 2010 15:16:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:05:22 UTC