W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > October 2010

Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-45: cite and longdesc support

From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
Date: Sun, 03 Oct 2010 22:41:12 -0500
Message-ID: <4CA94CD8.6010305@aptest.com>
To: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
CC: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
  I believe that the discussion was aware that this work might be done 
in XHTML+RDFa.  In the end, I agree with the working group that it would 
be inappropriate at this time to try to introduce any processing rules 
for @cite and @longdesc in any flavor of RDFa.  My recollection of the 
meeting is that this opinion was agreed by the majority of the people 
present.

On 10/3/2010 5:48 PM, Leif Halvard Silli wrote:
> Manu Sporny, Sun, 03 Oct 2010 17:54:37 -0400:
>
>> However, the group that is handling HTML+RDFa is the HTML WG and a bug
>> would have to be logged against the HTML+RDFa spec in HTML WG to see how
>> that group would like to proceed with @cite and @longdesc support.
> Done, citing alignment with Microdata, simplicity and XHTML2 as
> justification: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10970 (I
> now realize that I should have filed the bug against HTML+RDFa at the
> same time that as ISSUE-45 was raised, however, I expected the the
> things to follow suit.)
>
>>> In the minutes, as well as above, you spoke about "RDFa Core". Whereas
>>> the title of ISSUE-45 made clear that the issue was about "XHTML+RDFa
>>> and HTML+RDFa".
>> Yes, that's true. Forgive me for not remembering if we specifically
>> mentioned XHTML+RDFa or HTML+RDFa.
> In the debate, Shane and I specifically made clear that ISSUE-45 was
> limited to XHTML+RDFa - RDFa core was another subject. Hence, this
> amounts to answer another question. That the participants in the telcon
> meeting talked past each others, also seems like a possibility to me
> now. So perhaps be you could look at the issue again - at least for the
> purpose of clarifying whether the issue of bringing @cite and @longdesc
> support into XHTML+RDFa, without doing the same in RDFa core, was
> considered when you decided to propose to close the issue?

-- 
Shane P. McCarron                          Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
Managing Director                            Fax: +1 763 786-8180
ApTest Minnesota                            Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Monday, 4 October 2010 03:42:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:05:21 UTC