Re: Some RDFa 1.1 Core edge cases that we need to clarify

On Oct 25, 2010, at 23:13 , Toby Inkster wrote:

> On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 10:50:03 -0500
> Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com> wrote:
> 
>> Yeah.... that's just ugly.  I think we should say the terms are put
>> in the list in the order they are declared, and that it is the FIRST 
>> case-insensitive match that counts.
> 
> But profiles are written in RDF, and the expected behaviour of RDF
> implementations is that the order the triples are expressed in a file
> is not significant (and note that in my example both "agent" and
> "Agent" were defined in the same profile). Asking implementations to
> take notice of the order of term declarations in a profile will cause a
> lot of hassle for people building RDFa parsers on top of off-the-shelf
> RDF libraries.
> 

Fully agree. The order disappears by the time the triples are used for anything. 

Ivan


> -- 
> Toby A Inkster
> <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk>
> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
> 


----
Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf

Received on Tuesday, 26 October 2010 14:17:51 UTC