- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:17:15 -0500
- To: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- CC: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Sorry for the delay in replying to this... On 10/19/2010 2:51 PM, Toby Inkster wrote: > On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 22:19:06 -0500 > Shane McCarron<shane@aptest.com> wrote: > >> Sorry for the confusion earlier. There is an updated editor's >> draft at >> http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/drafts/2010/ED-rdfa-core-20101018/ > 2.2: the profile example is wrong dc/dcterms. Nice catch - fixed! > 3.3-3.6, 7.3, 8.1-8.2: the URIs for Albert Einstein, the German Empire, > the United States, etc should not start with<http://dbpedia.org/page/> > but<http://dbpedia.org/resource/>. Fixed. > 3.10: mentions @src in the same breath as @resource and @href, whereas > @src actually behaves more like @about. In non-chained mode, I agree... @resource, @href, and @src an set either objects or subjects, depending on usage. I made a change. > 6: "An RDFa Processor must not use the XML 'default namespace' as the > 'default prefix'." -- perhaps needs rephrasing, as is suggests that > something like this is illegal: > > <g xmlns="http://example.com/" vocab="http://example.com/"> Fixed. > 8: Most of these examples are missing prefix mappings. For little > snippets which don't purport to be full documents, that's fine. For the > longer ones which include entire<html> elements, at least an @profile > should be there. Fixed. I added the prefixes in use in the examples to our mythical example.com RDFa Profile at the top of the document, then referenced it. > 8.3.1.3: A lot of problems here. "It does not help to escape the > content, since the output would simply be a string of text containing > numerous ampersands" is simply nonsense. The following: > > <html property=":foo" content="<bar>" /> > > is parsed as: > > <> :foo "<bar>" . > > The phrase "To make authoring easier, if there are child elements and > no @datatype attribute, then the effect is the same as if @datatype > have been explicitly set to rdf:XMLLiteral" is no longer true. That > phrase and the following couple of examples with their explanations > need removing/revising. > Yeah... that was a mess. Thanks. I have fixed it. -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Thursday, 21 October 2010 19:18:02 UTC