public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org from May 2008 by date

Saturday, 31 May 2008

RDF and the Monkey (Yahoo! Developer Network blog) Ivan Herman

Friday, 30 May 2008

Re: librdfa fully conformant - passes 86/86 Test Cases Ivan Herman
Re: Implementation issue with TC#78 Manu Sporny

Thursday, 29 May 2008

meeting record: 2008-05-29 RDF-in-XHTML Task Force Ralph R. Swick
Re: ISSUE-103: substantive issue that requires opinion + discussion Mark Birbeck
Re: ISSUE-103: substantive issue that requires opinion + discussion Dan Brickley
Re: ISSUE-103: substantive issue that requires opinion + discussion Ralph R. Swick
Re: crazy ivan question? (sparql.org issues) Benjamin Nowack
Re: Implementation issue with TC#78 Ivan Herman
RE: Telecon Agenda - Thursday 29 May 2008, 1500 UTC Hausenblas, Michael
Re: Implementation issue with TC#78 Manu Sporny
Re: Implementation issue with TC#78 Mark Birbeck
librdfa fully conformant - passes 86/86 Test Cases Manu Sporny
Re: telecon Micah Dubinko
Telecon Agenda - Thursday 29 May 2008, 1500 UTC Manu Sporny
telecon Ben Adida
Implementation issue with TC#78 Manu Sporny

Wednesday, 28 May 2008

Re: crazy ivan question? (sparql.org issues) Manu Sporny
RE: crazy ivan question? (sparql.org issues) Seaborne, Andy
Re: [RDFa TC] Update Manu Sporny
Re: RDFa functional spec Micah Dubinko
Re: [RDFa TC] Update Manu Sporny
Re: crazy ivan question? (sparql.org issues) Ivan Herman
Re: Using RDFa to produce self-describing HTML Dan Connolly
RE: crazy ivan question? (sparql.org issues) Seaborne, Andy
Re: crazy ivan question? (sparql.org issues) Manu Sporny
RE: Crazy Ivan update Hausenblas, Michael
Crazy Ivan update Manu Sporny
Using RDFa to produce self-describing HTML Steven Pemberton
Re: RDFa functional spec Steven Pemberton
RE: crazy ivan question? Hausenblas, Michael
RE: Test #53 Hausenblas, Michael
crazy ivan question? Ivan Herman
Test #53 Ivan Herman

Tuesday, 27 May 2008

Re: ISSUE-103: substantive issue that requires opinion + discussion Ivan Herman
Re: ISSUE-103: substantive issue that requires opinion + discussion Shane McCarron
Re: ISSUE-103: substantive issue that requires opinion + discussion Ivan Herman
Re: ISSUE-103: substantive issue that requires opinion + discussion Shane McCarron
Re: ISSUE-103: substantive issue that requires opinion + discussion Manu Sporny
Re: [RDFa TC] Update Toby A Inkster
Re: ISSUE-103: substantive issue that requires opinion + discussion Ivan Herman
Re: Bnode issues with 16 approved test cases Ivan Herman
Re: [RDFa TC] Update Ivan Herman
ISSUE-103: substantive issue that requires opinion + discussion Ben Adida

Monday, 26 May 2008

RE: Bnode issues with 16 approved test cases Hausenblas, Michael
Re: Bnode issues with 16 approved test cases Manu Sporny
RE: Bnode issues with 16 approved test cases Hausenblas, Michael
Re: Bnode issues with 16 approved test cases Ben Adida
Bnode issues with 16 approved test cases Manu Sporny
Re: RDFa Primer ready for Working Group review Ben Adida
Re: [RDFa TC] Update Manu Sporny
Re: [RDFa] Comments on the RDFa Primer Ben Adida
Re: RDFa Primer -- some comments Ben Adida
Re: RDFa Primer ready for Working Group review Ben Adida
[RDFa TC] Update Hausenblas, Michael

Saturday, 24 May 2008

TC#103 is incorrect, SPARQL needs to be updated Manu Sporny
TC#102 is incorrect, SPARQL needs to be updated Manu Sporny
TC#101 is incorrect, SPARQL needs to be updated Manu Sporny
TC#100 is incorrect, SPARQL needs to be updated Manu Sporny
TC#94 is incorrect, SPARQL needs to be updated Manu Sporny
TC#92 is incorrect, SPARQL needs to be updated Manu Sporny

Thursday, 22 May 2008

Re: comments from PFWG on RDFa in XHTML spec Al Gilman

Wednesday, 21 May 2008

RDFa functional spec Micah Dubinko
Re: following up on ISSUE-110, @src Mark Birbeck
Re: Reminder: regrets for this week Ben Adida
Re: Draft: Using RDFa to produce self-describing HTML Shane McCarron
Draft: Using RDFa to produce self-describing HTML Steven Pemberton
Re: Reminder: regrets for this week Simone Onofri
Reminder: regrets for this week Steven Pemberton
Re: following up on ISSUE-110, @src Laurens Holst
Re: following up on ISSUE-109, @cite Laurens Holst
RE: Real URLs for real things Pete Johnston
RE: Real URLs for real things Hausenblas, Michael
RE: Thursday Telecon Hausenblas, Michael
Thursday Telecon Ben Adida
following up on ISSUE-110, @src Ben Adida
following up on ISSUE-109, @cite Ben Adida

Tuesday, 20 May 2008

Re: Real URLs for real things Steven Pemberton

Monday, 19 May 2008

Re: Mark, Ben - please review TC#105 & TC#106 Ben Adida
Mark, Ben - please review TC#105 & TC#106 Manu Sporny
Re: 2 RDFa SPARQL Test Harness Issues Benjamin Nowack
[RDFa TC] Updates Hausenblas, Michael

Sunday, 18 May 2008

Re: TC#88: Interpretation of _: CURIE Ivan Herman
TC#88: Interpretation of _: CURIE Manu Sporny
Re: 2 RDFa SPARQL Test Harness Issues Manu Sporny
RDFa TC#11 SPARQL is incorrect Manu Sporny
RE: 2 RDFa SPARQL Test Harness Issues Seaborne, Andy
Re: 2 RDFa SPARQL Test Harness Issues Manu Sporny
Re: 2 RDFa SPARQL Test Harness Issues Manu Sporny

Saturday, 17 May 2008

Re: [Fwd: [uf-discuss] Fwd: [whatwg] Removing @rev] Mark Birbeck
RE: 2 RDFa SPARQL Test Harness Issues Seaborne, Andy
Re: 2 RDFa SPARQL Test Harness Issues Dave Beckett
2 RDFa SPARQL Test Harness Issues Manu Sporny
Re: [Fwd: [uf-discuss] Fwd: [whatwg] Removing @rev] Ivan Herman

Friday, 16 May 2008

Re: [Fwd: [uf-discuss] Fwd: [whatwg] Removing @rev] Niklas Lindström
Re: [Fwd: [uf-discuss] Fwd: [whatwg] Removing @rev] Ben Adida
New draft of RDFa Syntax available Shane McCarron

Thursday, 15 May 2008

[Fwd: [uf-discuss] Fwd: [whatwg] Removing @rev] Manu Sporny
Re: Real URLs for real things Laurian Gridinoc
meeting record: 2008-05-15 RDFa telecon Ralph R. Swick
Re: Real URLs for real things Ben Adida
Re: Real URLs for real things Steven Pemberton
RE: Real URLs for real things Hausenblas, Michael
Real URLs for real things Steven Pemberton
Re: Telecon Agenda - Thursday 15 May 2008 Mark Birbeck
RE: Telecon Agenda - Thursday 15 May 2008 Hausenblas, Michael
Re: Telecon Agenda - Thursday 15 May 2008 Simone Onofri
quick update Ben Adida

Wednesday, 14 May 2008

Re: Nested hanging rels Tore Eriksson
Telecon Agenda - Thursday 15 May 2008 Manu Sporny
RE: Test Case #109: xml:base should be ignored in XHTML+RDFa 1.0 Hausenblas, Michael
Re: Nested hanging rels Mark Birbeck
Nested hanging rels Tore Eriksson

Tuesday, 13 May 2008

Test Case #109: xml:base should be ignored in XHTML+RDFa 1.0 Manu Sporny
Re: librdfa tri-licensed to be compatible with Redland/Raptor Manu Sporny
Re: librdfa tri-licensed to be compatible with Redland/Raptor Shane McCarron
Re: librdfa tri-licensed to be compatible with Redland/Raptor Dave Beckett
Re: ISSUE-7 : Response to Comments from Christian Hoertnagl Christian Hoertnagl
Re: [Fwd: New draft of TAG Finding: The Self-Describing Web] Shane McCarron
Re: RDFa Primer ready for Working Group review Ed Summers
Re: RDFa in the FAO FNA we site Manu Sporny
RDFa in the FAO FNA we site Sini, Margherita (KCEW)
CfP PICKME, the 3rd ExpertFinder workshop Lyndon Nixon
[RDFa TC ] Update Hausenblas, Michael
RE: [Fwd: New draft of TAG Finding: The Self-Describing Web] Hausenblas, Michael

Monday, 12 May 2008

[Fwd: New draft of TAG Finding: The Self-Describing Web] Shane McCarron
Re: librdfa tri-licensed to be compatible with Redland/Raptor Shane McCarron
Re: librdfa tri-licensed to be compatible with Redland/Raptor Dave Beckett
Re: Preservation of namespaces in XML Literals (was Re: RDFa Test Harness) Ivan Herman
Test Case #17 (v2): specifying named bnode relationships Manu Sporny
Re: Test Case #17: specifying named bnode relationships Ivan Herman
Preservation of namespaces in XML Literals (was Re: RDFa Test Harness) Manu Sporny
Test Case #42 (v2): on IMG element @src specifies subject, not object Manu Sporny
Renaming Test Case #42 (was Re: Test Case #42: @src specifies subject on IMG, not object) Manu Sporny
Re: Test Case #42: @src specifies subject on IMG, not object Shane McCarron
Test Case #42: @src specifies subject on IMG, not object Manu Sporny
Test Case #108: Specifying a plain literal with datatype="" and xml:lang preservation Manu Sporny
Test Case #107: Specifying a plain literal with datatype="" Manu Sporny
Test Case #17: specifying named bnode relationships Manu Sporny

Sunday, 11 May 2008

Re: librdfa tri-licensed to be compatible with Redland/Raptor Dan Brickley
librdfa tri-licensed to be compatible with Redland/Raptor Manu Sporny
Resolving ON HOLD Test Cases Manu Sporny
Re: ISSUE-120: Ambiguous Situation with nested @rel where inner @rel is neither CURIE nor link type Shane McCarron
Re: ISSUE-120: Ambiguous Situation with nested @rel where inner @rel is neither CURIE nor link type Mark Birbeck
Re: Silly Question - do we need to explicitly say what to do with illegal URIs? Karl Dubost

Saturday, 10 May 2008

Re: ISSUE-120: Ambiguous Situation with nested @rel where inner @rel is neither CURIE nor link type Shane McCarron
Re: ISSUE-120: Ambiguous Situation with nested @rel where inner @rel is neither CURIE nor link type Manu Sporny
Test Case #106: chaining with empty value in inner @rel Manu Sporny
Test Case #105 (v2): inner @rel is neither CURIE nor LinkType behavior Manu Sporny
Re: Biological Taxonomy Vocabulary 0.1 Michael Schneider
Re: Test Case #105: inner @rel is neither CURIE nor link type behavior Ben Adida
Re: ISSUE-120: Ambiguous Situation with nested @rel where inner @rel is neither CURIE nor link type Ben Adida
Re: Biological Taxonomy Vocabulary 0.1 Dan Brickley
(Answer #2) Re: ISSUE-120: Ambiguous Situation with nested @rel where inner @rel is neither CURIE nor link type Ivan Herman
Re: ISSUE-120: Ambiguous Situation with nested @rel where inner @rel is neither CURIE nor link type Ivan Herman
Re: ISSUE-120: Ambiguous Situation with nested @rel where inner @rel is neither CURIE nor link type Manu Sporny
Re: Test Case #105: inner @rel is neither CURIE nor link type behavior Mark Birbeck
Re: ISSUE-120: Ambiguous Situation with nested @rel where inner @rel is neither CURIE nor link type Mark Birbeck
Test Case #105: inner @rel is neither CURIE nor link type behavior Manu Sporny
Re: ISSUE-120: Ambiguous Situation with nested @rel where inner @rel is neither CURIE nor link type Ivan Herman

Friday, 9 May 2008

Re: Biological Taxonomy Vocabulary 0.1 Renato golin
Re: ISSUE-120: Ambiguous Situation with nested @rel where inner @rel is neither CURIE nor link type Ivan Herman
Re: ISSUE-120: Ambiguous Situation with nested @rel where inner @rel is neither CURIE nor link type Shane McCarron
Re: ISSUE-120: Ambiguous Situation with nested @rel where inner @rel is neither CURIE nor link type Ivan Herman
Silly Question - do we need to explicitly say what to do with illegal URIs? Shane McCarron
Re: Biological Taxonomy Vocabulary 0.1 Toby Inkster
Re: Biological Taxonomy Vocabulary 0.1 KANZAKI Masahide
Re: ISSUE-120: Ambiguous Situation with nested @rel where inner @rel is neither CURIE nor link type Shane McCarron
Re: Biological Taxonomy Vocabulary 0.1 Toby Inkster
Re: Biological Taxonomy Vocabulary 0.1 Renato Golin
Re: ISSUE-120: Ambiguous Situation with nested @rel where inner @rel is neither CURIE nor link type Ivan Herman
Re: Biological Taxonomy Vocabulary 0.1 Richard Cyganiak
Re: ISSUE-120: Ambiguous Situation with nested @rel where inner @rel is neither CURIE nor link type Shane McCarron
Re: Biological Taxonomy Vocabulary 0.1 Toby Inkster
Re: Biological Taxonomy Vocabulary 0.1 Renato Golin
Re: an issue we need to address - bad @rel in the middle of a chain. Mark Birbeck
RE: Biological Taxonomy Vocabulary 0.1 Hausenblas, Michael
Re: ISSUE-120: Ambiguous Situation with nested @rel where inner @rel is neither CURIE nor link type Ivan Herman
Re: an issue we need to address - bad @rel in the middle of a chain. Shane McCarron
ISSUE-120: Ambiguous Situation with nested @rel where inner @rel is neither CURIE nor link type SWD Issue Tracker
an issue we need to address - bad @rel in the middle of a chain. Ben Adida

Thursday, 8 May 2008

Biological Taxonomy Vocabulary 0.1 Toby A Inkster
ISSUE-99 follow-up Ben Adida
Re: Serving and Validating XHTML+RDFa Shane McCarron
Serving and Validating XHTML+RDFa James Pickering
Re: comment/question on the latest RDFa editor's draft: role attribute Ivan Herman
Re: comment/question on the latest RDFa editor's draft: role attribute Shane McCarron
ISSUE-7 : Response to Comments from Christian Hoertnagl Manu Sporny
Re: comment/question on the latest RDFa editor's draft: role attribute Ivan Herman
Last call announcement: CURIEs Steven Pemberton
Re: comment/question on the latest RDFa editor's draft: role attribute Shane McCarron
a relevant reading: ARIA attributes Ivan Herman
RDFa Primer -- some comments Roland Merrick
comment/question on the latest RDFa editor's draft: role attribute Ivan Herman
Re: comments from PFWG on RDFa in XHTML spec Ben Adida
non-normative paragraph for the HTML fragment issue, ISSUE-113 Ben Adida
Telecon Agenda - Thursday 8 May 2008 Ben Adida

Wednesday, 7 May 2008

Tuesday, 6 May 2008

Re: JS Test Harness Ben Adida
JS Test Harness Elias Torres
CfP: 1st Social Data on the Web workshop (SDoW2008) Sergio Fernández

Monday, 5 May 2008

ISWC 2008 deadlines this week and next Tim Finin
[RDFa IR] Updates Hausenblas, Michael
RE: [RDFa] Comments on the RDFa Primer Sini, Margherita (KCEW)
Re: Digg and RDFa... Karl Dubost

Sunday, 4 May 2008

Digg and RDFa... Ivan Herman

Friday, 2 May 2008

Explanation of Updates to RDFa Syntax Ben Adida
Re: Telecon Agenda - Thursday 1 May 2008, 1500 UTC Dave Beckett
Re: Updated RDFa Syntax Editor's Draft Toby A Inkster
Re: Updated RDFa Syntax Editor's Draft Ivan Herman

Thursday, 1 May 2008

Re: xsd:date or xsd:#date? Shane McCarron
xsd:date or xsd:#date? Micah Dubinko
Updated RDFa Syntax Editor's Draft Shane McCarron
meeting record: 2008-05-01 RDFa telecon Ralph R. Swick
Re: Telecon Agenda - Thursday 1 May 2008, 1500 UTC Ben Adida
Re: Telecon Agenda - Thursday 1 May 2008, 1500 UTC Manu Sporny
Re: Telecon Agenda - Thursday 1 May 2008, 1500 UTC Toby A Inkster
Re: Telecon Agenda - Thursday 1 May 2008, 1500 UTC Ben Adida
Regrets Steven Pemberton
Re: Telecon Agenda - Thursday 1 May 2008, 1500 UTC Simone Onofri
AW: Telecon Agenda - Thursday 1 May 2008, 1500 UTC Hausenblas, Michael
Re: Telecon Agenda - Thursday 1 May 2008, 1500 UTC Ivan Herman
Re: Telecon Agenda - Thursday 1 May 2008, 1500 UTC Toby A Inkster
Re: Telecon Agenda - Thursday 1 May 2008, 1500 UTC Manu Sporny

Last message date: Saturday, 31 May 2008 07:34:05 UTC