- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 01 May 2008 08:45:16 +0200
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- CC: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>, RDFa mailing list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 1 May 2008 07:06:45 UTC
Manu Sporny wrote: > Ben Adida wrote: >> 2) Implementation Report >> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/implementation-report/ >> - which implementations should we pick? > > PyRDFa, librdfa, ARC2, and we could include SPREAD if Shane wants to > include it. > Fabien's XSLT script would be good to have, too >> - Any we've missed? > > librdfa, Operator's RDFa parser implementation (by Elias), and SPREAD > >> - status of implementations? > > All of the ones that are being tracked in Crazy Ivan[1] need to > implement the new XMLLiteral namespace preservation rule. > Well, the experience shows that crazy ivan will fail on those, due to the problems with SPARQL engines with XML Literal. Ie, we should be prepared to manually 'approve' some of the test results, it cannot be 100% automatic:-( Ivan > -- manu > > [1] http://rdfa.digitalbazaar.com/rdfa-test-harness/ > -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Thursday, 1 May 2008 07:06:45 UTC