- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 02 May 2008 07:14:14 +0200
- To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Cc: "public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf.w3.org" <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, public-xhtml2@w3.org, public-swd-wg@w3.org
Cool! I only had a quick look at the processing step part (which was, I guess, the most critical) but it looks o.k. to me. Removing that return flag made it a bit simpler, in fact, as Mark predicted... I noted that there are two more predefined @rel values. We should think about updating the corresponding test case... I am a little bit suprised (not having followed this discussion in details, I am afraid, sorry about that) that we have now two SHOULD things on conformance, namely @profile and @version. Isn't that an overkill? Is there a subtle difference between the two and that is why we need both? Maybe some explanatory text in the spec might be in order... Ivan Shane McCarron wrote: > > As per my implied action item today, I have updated the Editor's Draft > of RDFa Syntax. The update, including diff marks from the previous > editor's draft AND from the last call draft, is available at > http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2008/ED-rdfa-syntax-20080501/ > > Note that I do not believe this draft to be perfect. There are likely > broken links, validity problems etc. It is just a snapshot reflecting > all changes as a result of last call comments thus far. > -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead URL: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ PGP Key: http://www.cwi.nl/%7Eivan/AboutMe/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Friday, 2 May 2008 05:14:30 UTC