- From: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
- Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 19:20:07 -0700
- To: Laurens Holst <lholst@students.cs.uu.nl>
- CC: RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Laurens, I wanted to check in with you regarding our resolution of ISSUE-109: http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/109 Specifically, here's our resolution text: "We considered @cite but realized that many other attributes would then require RDFa interpretation and that doing so is not simple. We defer this issue to a future version of RDFa." Is this acceptable from your point of view? -Ben
Received on Wednesday, 21 May 2008 02:20:46 UTC