Re: following up on ISSUE-109, @cite

Ben Adida schreef:
> Laurens,
> I wanted to check in with you regarding our resolution of ISSUE-109:
> Specifically, here's our resolution text:
> "We considered @cite but realized that many other attributes would 
> then require RDFa interpretation and that doing so is not simple. We 
> defer this issue to a future version of RDFa."
> Is this acceptable from your point of view? 

Yes, I agree with that.


Ushiko-san! Kimi wa doushite, Ushiko-san nan da!!
Laurens Holst, student, university of Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Website: Backbase employee;

Received on Wednesday, 21 May 2008 11:22:56 UTC