- From: Roland Merrick <roland_merrick@uk.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 May 2008 14:35:06 +0100
- To: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF3902C346.1D9DB6F8-ON80257443.0049EED6-80257443.004A9FE8@uk.ibm.com>
Greetings, I have been looking at the latest, in progress, draft at http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/primer/20080422/ and have a few comments. I think this version is much better that the previous versions. 2.1 Licensing your Work http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/primer/20080422/#IDA1FX3C includes the following example ... All content on this site is licensed under a <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/"> Creative Commons License </a>. but the image shows something different: distributed under a Creative Commons License 2.3 Multiple Items per Page http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/primer/20080422/#IDAAZX3C in the previous section you introduced "@property, a new HTML attribute introduced by RDFa" but here you say "RDFa provides @about, a new attribute", is this also a new HTML attribute? Why describe differently if you want the user to understand that they have something in common? Same applies to later attributes. what does the example -- about="/posts/trouble_with_bob" -- actually refer to? Looks like a relative reference, but relative to what? Same for -- about="/posts/jos_barbecue" -- The figure after the example clears it up, I think. -- about="http://example.com/bob/photos/sunset.jpg" -- seems clear Why not start with the absolute example and then illustrate a relative one? 3.1 Contact Information http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/primer/20080422/#IDAJ0X3C the dreaded blank node! While this section improves on the last version of this document I still think a lot a care is needed to introduce the concept and its usage. You state: . . . This node has no URL to identify it, so it is called a blank node. Nowhere in the earlier sections is there a definition of what constitutes a node which makes the introduction of a new "kind" of node, a "blank node", tricky. The diagram includes a node labelled _:blanknode1, which is presumably meant to represent the "blank node". Why such a strangely formatted label? Can the connection be made clearer. One example includes <div class="social-network" about="#me" rel="foaf:knows"> where is there something that establishes the connection between #me and http://example.com/alice#me. Regards, Roland FBCS, CITP Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
Received on Thursday, 8 May 2008 13:36:27 UTC