- From: Roland Merrick <roland_merrick@uk.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 May 2008 14:35:06 +0100
- To: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF3902C346.1D9DB6F8-ON80257443.0049EED6-80257443.004A9FE8@uk.ibm.com>
Greetings, I have been looking at the latest, in progress, draft at
http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/primer/20080422/ and have a few
comments.
I think this version is much better that the previous versions.
2.1 Licensing your Work
http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/primer/20080422/#IDA1FX3C
includes the following example
...
All content on this site is licensed under a
<a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">
Creative Commons License
</a>.
but the image shows something different:
distributed under
a Creative Commons License
2.3 Multiple Items per Page
http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/primer/20080422/#IDAAZX3C
in the previous section you introduced "@property, a new HTML attribute
introduced by RDFa"
but here you say "RDFa provides @about, a new attribute", is this also a
new HTML attribute? Why describe differently if you want the user to
understand that they have something in common? Same applies to later
attributes.
what does the example -- about="/posts/trouble_with_bob" -- actually refer
to? Looks like a relative reference, but relative to what? Same for --
about="/posts/jos_barbecue" --
The figure after the example clears it up, I think.
-- about="http://example.com/bob/photos/sunset.jpg" -- seems clear
Why not start with the absolute example and then illustrate a relative
one?
3.1 Contact Information
http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/primer/20080422/#IDAJ0X3C
the dreaded blank node! While this section improves on the last version of
this document I still think a lot a care is needed to introduce the
concept and its usage.
You state: . . . This node has no URL to identify it, so it is called a
blank node.
Nowhere in the earlier sections is there a definition of what constitutes
a node which makes the introduction of a new "kind" of node, a "blank
node", tricky. The diagram includes a node labelled _:blanknode1, which is
presumably meant to represent the "blank node". Why such a strangely
formatted label? Can the connection be made clearer.
One example includes
<div class="social-network" about="#me" rel="foaf:knows">
where is there something that establishes the connection between #me and
http://example.com/alice#me.
Regards, Roland
FBCS, CITP
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
Received on Thursday, 8 May 2008 13:36:27 UTC