Re: librdfa fully conformant - passes 86/86 Test Cases

As for pyRDFa:

- It fails on tests #100-103 as usual, to be checked by hand
- It also fails on #11, #92, and #94, but these are also XML Literal 
issues. In all three cases the SPARQL includes the namespaces for _all_ 
namespaces of the original XHTML (ie, they all include the dc 
namespace), whereas pyRdfa adds only those that are really _used_ in 
that XML Literal (therefore cutting, for example, the dc namespace out!).

It passes all other tests (thanks to the most recent update of crazy 
ivan by Manu!)

In all fairness, when writing down the final implementation report, we 
should cross check one another's results for all those tests, to avoid 
bias. Ie, I would probably ask Manu or somebody else to check the 
results of pyRdfa manually, and I would do the same with others...

Ivan

Manu Sporny wrote:
> Just finished fixing the last remaining issues with librdfa, it passes
> all 86 Test Cases (including #105 and #106, which are currently
> UNREVIEWED). TC100-103 were checked by hand.
> 
> The latest source and RedHat/Debian/Slackware packages are available via
> the website:
> 
> http://rdfa.digitalbazaar.com/librdfa/
> 
> or, for the source:
> 
> git clone http://rdfa.digitalbazaar.com/librdfa.git
> 
> -- manu
> 

-- 

Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf