public-owl-wg@w3.org from March 2009 by author

Alan Ruttenberg

• Re: I've implemented the changes to xsd:dateTimeStamp (Monday, 30 March)
• Re: CURIEs (was Re: Several minor problems in the grammar for the functional-style syntax) (Monday, 23 March)
• Re: Jan Wielemaker is o.k. I think (Thursday, 19 March)
• Re: new draft response for LC comment 66 AR1 (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: LC comments 18, 19, 59 (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: Agenda TC 18/03/2009 (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: A Last Call comment about the seamtnics of xsd:dateTimeStamp in OWL 2 (caused by the yesterday's decision about numerics) (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: Datatype disjointness implemented (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: MSM1, RIF1 (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: new draft response for LC comment 66 AR1 (Wednesday, 18 March)
• response to FH3 (Wednesday, 18 March)
• MSM1, RIF1 (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: LC comments 18, 19, 59 (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: LC comments 18, 19, 59 (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: draft response for LC comment 20 JDB1 (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Re: A Last Call comment about the seamtnics of xsd:dateTimeStamp in OWL 2 (caused by the yesterday's decision about numerics) (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Re: draft response to LC comment 60/JC2 (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Re: draft response for LC comment 20 JDB1 (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Re: LC responses 28, 48 & 58 (Monday, 16 March)
• Re: draft response for LC comment 63 JO1 (Monday, 16 March)
• Fwd: draft response for LC comment 63 JO1 (Monday, 16 March)
• Re: draft response for LC comment 20 JDB1 (Monday, 16 March)
• Re: draft response for LC comment 63 JO1 (Monday, 16 March)
• Re: draft response to LC comment 60/JC2 (Monday, 16 March)
• Re: Datatype disjointness implemented (Monday, 16 March)
• Re: changes to document overview (done) (Monday, 16 March)
• Re: Datatype disjointness implemented (Monday, 16 March)
• Re: Datatype disjointness implemented (Thursday, 12 March)
• Re: draft response for LC comment 66 AR1 (Thursday, 12 March)
• Re: draft response for 52b / JR6b (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: links to bibliography (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: Response draft for Jan Wielemaker JR8-2/54 (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: review of document-overview (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: review of document-overview (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: changes to document overview (done) (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: changes to document overview (done) (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: changes to document overview (done) (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: Agenda for TC 2009-03-11 - Note meeting 1 hour earlier than usual in Europe due to daylight saving time differences (Tuesday, 10 March)
• Agenda for TC 2008-03-11 - Note meeting 1 hour earlier than usual in Europe due to daylight saving time differences (Tuesday, 10 March)
• Re: unhappy responses (Monday, 9 March)
• Re: unhappy responses (Thursday, 5 March)
• Re: unhappy responses (Thursday, 5 March)
• Re: unhappy responses (Thursday, 5 March)

Antoine Zimmermann

• Re: Review of QRG (Action 307) (Friday, 27 March)
• Re: LC comments 18, 19, 59 (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: A Last Call comment about the seamtnics of xsd:dateTimeStamp in OWL 2 (caused by the yesterday's decision about numerics) (Friday, 13 March)
• Re: Draft Response for LC Comment 22 MSM1 (Thursday, 12 March)
• US / UK dialect in OWL docs (Tuesday, 10 March)

Bernardo Cuenca Grau

• Action 309: Review of QR document (Tuesday, 17 March)

Bijan Parsia

• Acknowlegment glitch (Tuesday, 31 March)
• XML Syntax updated (Tuesday, 31 March)
• Re: Quick comments on the QRG (Monday, 30 March)
• Re: review of rdf:text (Monday, 30 March)
• Re: Review of the Syntax document (action 312) (Monday, 30 March)
• Re: Review of the Syntax document (action 312) (Sunday, 29 March)
• Recommend suffixes and mimetype (Sunday, 29 March)
• Re: Review of QRG (Action 307) (Saturday, 28 March)
• Re: Review of QRG (Action 307) (Friday, 27 March)
• Re: Review of QRG (Action 307) (Friday, 27 March)
• Re: Review of QRG (Action 307) (Friday, 27 March)
• Re: Review of QRG (Action 307) (Friday, 27 March)
• Re: keys and format (Wednesday, 25 March)
• Re: keys and format (Wednesday, 25 March)
• Re: ACTION-308 Review QRG (Tuesday, 24 March)
• PROPOSAL: CHANGES for CURIEs (Monday, 23 March)
• Re: syntax/semantics confusion in 'Syntax' document (Monday, 23 March)
• ACTION-308 Review QRG (Monday, 23 March)
• Re: CURIEs (was Re: Several minor problems in the grammar for the functional-style syntax) (Monday, 23 March)
• Re: [PROPOSAL] CURIES in OWL/XML (Monday, 23 March)
• [PROPOSAL] CURIES in OWL/XML (Monday, 23 March)
• Re: CURIEs (was Re: Several minor problems in the grammar for the functional-style syntax) (Monday, 23 March)
• Re: CURIEs (was Re: Several minor problems in the grammar for the functional-style syntax) (Monday, 23 March)
• CURIEs (was Re: Several minor problems in the grammar for the functional-style syntax) (Monday, 23 March)
• Re: Several minor problems in the grammar for the functional-style syntax (Sunday, 22 March)
• Re: Several minor problems in the grammar for the functional-style syntax (Sunday, 22 March)
• Re: Several minor problems in the grammar for the functional-style syntax (Sunday, 22 March)
• Re: GRRDL notes (Friday, 20 March)
• GRRDL notes (Friday, 20 March)
• Re: Jan Wielemaker is o.k. I think (Thursday, 19 March)
• Re: New XML Schema is in the Wiki (Thursday, 19 March)
• Re: new draft response for LC comment 66 AR1 (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: Datatype disjointness implemented (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: MSM1, RIF1 (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: MSM1, RIF1 (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: response to FH3 (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: MSM1, RIF1 (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Fwd: LC comments 18, 19, 59 (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Re: ambiguity in XML Schema (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Re: ambiguity in XML Schema (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Re: Datatype disjointness implemented (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Re: Datatype disjointness implemented (Monday, 16 March)
• Re: Datatype disjointness implemented (Monday, 16 March)
• Re: CURIEs in OWL/XML (Saturday, 14 March)
• CURIEs in OWL/XML (Saturday, 14 March)
• Re: Datatype disjointness implemented (Thursday, 12 March)
• Re: GIF in W3C documents (Thursday, 12 March)
• Re: changes to document overview (done) (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: changes to document overview (done) (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: Response draft for Jan Wielemaker JR8-2/54 (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: Response draft for Jan Wielemaker JR8-2/54 (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: Response draft for Jan Wielemaker JR8-2/54 (Tuesday, 10 March)
• For those of you not on owl-dev (Tuesday, 10 March)
• Re: Response draft for Jan Wielemaker JR8-2/54 (Tuesday, 10 March)
• Re: Response draft for Jan Wielemaker JR8-2/54 (was draft responses for LC comment FH3/29) (Tuesday, 10 March)
• Re: unhappy responses (Monday, 9 March)
• Updated XML Schema (Monday, 9 March)
• Re: a different approach to OWL/XML (was: draft responses for LC comment FH3/29) (Monday, 9 March)
• Re: normative and non-normative references (Monday, 9 March)
• Re: draft responses for LC comment FH3/29 (Monday, 9 March)
• Re: draft responses for LC comment FH3/29 (Monday, 9 March)
• Re: normative and non-normative references (Monday, 9 March)
• Re: normative and non-normative references (Monday, 9 March)
• Re: draft responses for LC comment FH3/29 (Monday, 9 March)
• Re: CURIE is a rec (Sunday, 8 March)
• Re: normative and non-normative references (Friday, 6 March)
• Re: The issue of syntax productions within the NF&R document (Friday, 6 March)
• Re: [LC Response] To Ralf Moeller Re: OWL2 (Friday, 6 March)
• Re: unhappy responses (Thursday, 5 March)
• Re: unhappy responses (Thursday, 5 March)
• Re: The issue of syntax productions within the NF&R document (Thursday, 5 March)
• Re: unhappy responses (Thursday, 5 March)
• Re: unhappy responses (Thursday, 5 March)
• Re: [LC Comment] To Bijan Parsia Re: LC Comment: "Hidden" Axioms (Wednesday, 4 March)
• Re: Draft for the response to LC comment 58 (fully typed functional-style syntax) (Wednesday, 4 March)
• Re: draft response for LC comment 51 RM1 and 62 JM1 (Tuesday, 3 March)

Boris Motik

• RE: I've implemented the changes to xsd:dateTimeStamp (Tuesday, 31 March)
• RE: I've implemented the changes to xsd:dateTimeStamp (Monday, 30 March)
• RE: I've implemented the changes to xsd:dateTimeStamp (Monday, 30 March)
• RE: Review of the Syntax document (action 312) (Monday, 30 March)
• RE: Review of the Syntax document (action 312) (Sunday, 29 March)
• I've implemented the changes to xsd:dateTimeStamp (Saturday, 28 March)
• I've just replaced CURIEs with the SPARQL abbreviation mechanism (Saturday, 28 March)
• A number of changes in rdf:text (Thursday, 26 March)
• RE: Several minor problems in the grammar for the functional-style syntax (Sunday, 22 March)
• RE: Several minor problems in the grammar for the functional-style syntax (Sunday, 22 March)
• RE: Several minor problems in the grammar for the functional-style syntax (Sunday, 22 March)
• Several minor problems in the grammar for the functional-style syntax (Saturday, 21 March)
• RE: [LC response] To Jonathan Rees -- a proposal for responding to Johnatan's latest comments (Saturday, 21 March)
• I've implemented the change to the syntax of HasKey (Friday, 20 March)
• RE: A problem with HasKey in the functional-style syntax (Thursday, 19 March)
• RE: A problem with HasKey in the functional-style syntax (Wednesday, 18 March)
• New XML Schema is in the Wiki (Wednesday, 18 March)
• A problem with HasKey in the functional-style syntax (Wednesday, 18 March)
• RE: A Last Call comment about the seamtnics of xsd:dateTimeStamp in OWL 2 (caused by the yesterday's decision about numerics) (Tuesday, 17 March)
• RE: ambiguity in XML Schema (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Responses drafted for the comments by Jonathan Rees (numbers 33 and 44) (Saturday, 14 March)
• Changes to the spec that were decided at the F2F are done (Friday, 13 March)
• Datatype definitions implemented (Friday, 13 March)
• [LC response] To Ivan Herman (Friday, 13 March)
• RE: Datatype disjointness implemented (Friday, 13 March)
• Proposed response to LC call 12 (Theorem PR1) (Thursday, 12 March)
• Proposed response to LC call 12 (Theorem PR1) (Thursday, 12 March)
• RE: Datatype disjointness implemented (Thursday, 12 March)
• A Last Call comment about the seamtnics of xsd:dateTimeStamp in OWL 2 (caused by the yesterday's decision about numerics) (Thursday, 12 March)
• Datatype disjointness implemented (Thursday, 12 March)
• A description of the changes necessary to implement named data ranges (Thursday, 5 March)

Christine Golbreich

• Re: Review of QRG (Action 307) (Saturday, 28 March)
• Re: Review of QRG (Action 307) (Friday, 27 March)
• Re: Review of QRG (Action 307) (Friday, 27 March)
• Re: Review of QRG (Action 307) (Friday, 27 March)
• Review of QRG (Action 307) (Wednesday, 25 March)
• Re: Versions and Imports in NF&R, and syntactic stuff. (Friday, 20 March)
• Re: NF&R update (Friday, 20 March)
• Re: NF&R and OWL 1 use cases (Thursday, 19 March)
• Re: [LC response] To Guus Schreiber (Thursday, 19 March)
• Re: NF&R update (Wednesday, 18 March)
• keys and format (Wednesday, 18 March)
• NF&R update (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: Comment on NF&R Applicability of Use Case References (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: Closing action-306: Comments on the QRG (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Re: Closing action-306: Comments on the QRG (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Re: Draft Response for LC Comment 22 MSM1 (Thursday, 12 March)
• Re: US / UK dialect in OWL docs (Thursday, 12 March)
• Re: links to bibliography (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: review of document-overview (Tuesday, 10 March)
• Re: review of document-overview (Tuesday, 10 March)
• Re: The issue of syntax productions within the NF&R document (Sunday, 8 March)
• Re: The issue of syntax productions within the NF&R document (Saturday, 7 March)
• Re: The issue of syntax productions within the NF&R document (Saturday, 7 March)
• NF&R input (Friday, 6 March)
• Re: OWL2 comments -> UC#3 (Friday, 6 March)
• Re: The issue of syntax productions within the NF&R document (Thursday, 5 March)
• Re: Draft for the response to LC comment 58 (fully typed functional-style syntax) (Wednesday, 4 March)
• Re: Draft for the response to LC comment 58 (fully typed functional-style syntax) (Wednesday, 4 March)
• Re: OWL2 comments -> UC#3 (Tuesday, 3 March)
• Re: OWL2 comments -> UC#3 (Tuesday, 3 March)
• Re: OWL2 comments -> UC#3 (Tuesday, 3 March)
• Re: OWL2 comments -> UC#3 (Monday, 2 March)
• Re: OWL2 comments -> UC#3 (Monday, 2 March)

Deborah L. McGuinness

• Re: Quick comments on the QRG (Monday, 30 March)
• Re: Closing action-306: Comments on the QRG (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Re: draft response for LC comment 51 RM1 and 62 JM1 (Tuesday, 3 March)

Evan Wallace

• Re: I've implemented the changes to xsd:dateTimeStamp (Tuesday, 31 March)
• Re: I've implemented the changes to xsd:dateTimeStamp (Monday, 30 March)
• Re: draft response for LC comment 63 JO1 (Monday, 16 March)
• Re: review of document-overview (Tuesday, 10 March)
• The issue of syntax productions within the NF&R document (Wednesday, 4 March)
• Re: draft response for LC comment 51 RM1 and 62 JM1 (Tuesday, 3 March)
• Re: draft response for LC comment 51 RM1 and 62 JM1 (Tuesday, 3 March)

Giannis Tsakonas

• 13th European Conference on Digital Libraries - Submission Deadline Reminder (Thursday, 26 March)
• ECDL 2009 - Submission Deadline Extension (Wednesday, 18 March)
• ECDL 2009 Final Call for Papers / Submission System now Available (Monday, 16 March)
• 13th European Conference on Digital Libraries - Second Call for Special Tracks (Wednesday, 4 March)

Héctor Pérez-Urbina

• Agenda TC 01/04/2009 (Tuesday, 31 March)
• Agenda TC 25/03/2009 (Tuesday, 24 March)
• Agenda TC 18/03/2009 (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Agenda TC 04/03/2009 (Tuesday, 3 March)

Ian Horrocks

• Moving towards 2nd Last Call (Tuesday, 31 March)
• DAYLIGHT SAVING TIME (Sunday, 29 March)
• Re: OWL naming issues (Wednesday, 25 March)
• OWL naming issues (Tuesday, 24 March)
• Re: [LC response] To Jonathan Rees -- a proposal for responding to Johnatan's latest comments (Monday, 23 March)
• Re: CURIEs (was Re: Several minor problems in the grammar for the functional-style syntax) (Monday, 23 March)
• Re: A Last Call comment about the seamtnics of xsd:dateTimeStamp in OWL 2 (caused by the yesterday's decision about numerics) (Friday, 20 March)
• Re: scribe conventions (Thursday, 19 March)
• Re: NF&R and OWL 1 use cases (Thursday, 19 March)
• Re: Reference to Document Overview in LC responses (Thursday, 19 March)
• Re: Jan Wielemaker is o.k. I think (Thursday, 19 March)
• Re: LC comments 18, 19, 59 (Thursday, 19 March)
• Re: new draft response for LC comment 66 AR1 (Thursday, 19 March)
• Re: [LC response] To Guus Schreiber (Thursday, 19 March)
• Thanks to Bernardo for scribing (Thursday, 19 March)
• Float and Double in OWL RL (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Re: draft response for LC comment 20 JDB1 (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Re: ambiguity in XML Schema (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Re: LC responses 28, 48 & 58 (Monday, 16 March)
• Re: new draft LC response for 62 (Monday, 16 March)
• Re: draft response to LC comment 60/JC2 (Monday, 16 March)
• Re: draft response to LC 58 concerning OWL Full [RE: FYI - unresolved LC Comments] (Sunday, 15 March)
• Re: completed draft response for LC comment 21 JDB2 (Sunday, 15 March)
• Re: US / UK dialect in OWL docs (Sunday, 15 March)
• Re: changes to document overview (done) (Sunday, 15 March)
• Re: Comment on NF&R Applicability of Use Case References (Sunday, 15 March)
• Re: Comment on NF&R Appendix: Use Cases - Literature v. References (Sunday, 15 March)
• Re: proposed changes to Document Overview (Sunday, 15 March)
• Re: proposed changes to Document Overview (Sunday, 15 March)
• Re: draft response for LC comment 64 MS7 (Sunday, 15 March)
• Re: unhappy responses (Sunday, 15 March)
• LC responses 28, 48 & 58 (Saturday, 7 March)
• normative and non-normative references (Friday, 6 March)
• draft responses for LC comments JC1a and JC1b/34 et al (Friday, 6 March)
• draft responses for LC comment FH3/29 (Friday, 6 March)
• Re: NF&R input (Friday, 6 March)
• Re: The issue of syntax productions within the NF&R document (Friday, 6 March)
• Re: Wiki madness (Friday, 6 March)
• Re: unhappy responses (Friday, 6 March)
• Re: unhappy responses (Friday, 6 March)
• Fwd: [LC Response] To Ralf Moeller Re: OWL2 (Friday, 6 March)
• Re: OWL2 comments -> UC#3 (Thursday, 5 March)
• Re: A description of the changes necessary to implement named data ranges (Thursday, 5 March)
• Unresponsive commenters (Thursday, 5 March)
• draft response to LC comment 60/JC2 (Thursday, 5 March)
• draft response for LC comment 64 MS7 (Thursday, 5 March)
• Re: Implemented Resolution of LC Comment 34 (TQ) on property chains in RDF-Based Semantics (Monday, 2 March)
• Re: Implemented Resolution on LC-Comment 16 ("lexical value") in RDF-Based Semantics (Monday, 2 March)
• Re: Implemented Resolution of LC Comment 34 (TQ) on property chains in RDF-Based Semantics (Monday, 2 March)
• Re: draft response for LC comment 32 CO1 (Monday, 2 March)
• Re: Draft response to LC comment 46 (Monday, 2 March)
• Re: draft response for LC comment 25 RIF2 (Monday, 2 March)
• Re: draft response for 43b ZW3b (Monday, 2 March)
• Draft Response to LC comment 49/JR4 (Monday, 2 March)
• Re: Draft Response to LC comment 42/AS1 (Monday, 2 March)

Ivan Herman

• Re: RDF-Based Semantics ready for WG-internal Review (Tuesday, 31 March)
• Review of the RDF based semantics document (CLOSE ACTION-316) (Tuesday, 31 March)
• Re: Review of the Syntax document (action 312) (Monday, 30 March)
• Re: Review of the Syntax document (action 312) (Monday, 30 March)
• Re: RDF-Based Semantics ready for WG-internal Review (Monday, 30 March)
• Re: Document Overview published (Friday, 27 March)
• Review of the Syntax document (action 312) (Friday, 27 March)
• Re: OWL naming issues (Wednesday, 25 March)
• Re: PROPOSAL: CHANGES for CURIEs (Tuesday, 24 March)
• Re: CURIEs (was Re: Several minor problems in the grammar for the functional-style syntax) (Monday, 23 March)
• Re: CURIEs (was Re: Several minor problems in the grammar for the functional-style syntax) (Monday, 23 March)
• Re: Several minor problems in the grammar for the functional-style syntax (Sunday, 22 March)
• Re: [LC response] To Jonathan Rees -- a proposal for responding to Johnatan's latest comments (Sunday, 22 March)
• Re: Several minor problems in the grammar for the functional-style syntax (Sunday, 22 March)
• Re: Suggestion to change RDF encoding of HasKey axioms [RE: I've implemented the change to the syntax of HasKey] (Saturday, 21 March)
• Re: Suggestion to change RDF encoding of HasKey axioms [RE: I've implemented the change to the syntax of HasKey] (Saturday, 21 March)
• Re 2: Suggestion to change RDF encoding of HasKey axioms [RE: I've implemented the change to the syntax of HasKey] (Saturday, 21 March)
• Re: Suggestion to change RDF encoding of HasKey axioms [RE: I've implemented the change to the syntax of HasKey] (Saturday, 21 March)
• Re: GRRDL notes (Friday, 20 March)
• Re: NF&R update (Friday, 20 March)
• Re: Jan Wielemaker is o.k. I think (Friday, 20 March)
• Re: LC comments 18, 19, 59 (Friday, 20 March)
• Jan Wielemaker is o.k. I think (Thursday, 19 March)
• Re: A problem with HasKey in the functional-style syntax (Thursday, 19 March)
• Re: A problem with HasKey in the functional-style syntax (Thursday, 19 March)
• Re: Agenda TC 18/03/2009 (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: Closing action-306: Comments on the QRG (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Re: Closing action-306: Comments on the QRG (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Closing action-306: Comments on the QRG (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Re: [LC response] To Ivan Herman (Friday, 13 March)
• Re: Draft second response for LC Comment 51a RM1-2 (Friday, 13 March)
• Re: LC responses 28, 48 & 58 (Thursday, 12 March)
• Re: draft response for LC comment 24 RIF1 (Thursday, 12 March)
• Re: Draft Response for LC Comment 22 MSM1 (Thursday, 12 March)
• Re: new draft LC response for 62 (Thursday, 12 March)
• Re: draft response for 52b / JR6b (Thursday, 12 March)
• Re: LC responses 28, 48 & 58 (Thursday, 12 March)
• Re: Response draft for Jan Wielemaker JR8-2/54 (Thursday, 12 March)
• Re: LC responses 28, 48 & 58 (Thursday, 12 March)
• Re: LC responses 28, 48 & 58 (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: review of document-overview (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: Response draft for Jan Wielemaker JR8-2/54 (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: review of document-overview (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: Response draft for Jan Wielemaker JR8-2/54 (Tuesday, 10 March)
• Re: review of document-overview (Tuesday, 10 March)
• Re: review of document-overview (Tuesday, 10 March)
• Re: review of document-overview (Tuesday, 10 March)
• Response draft for Jan Wielemaker JR8-2/54 (was draft responses for LC comment FH3/29) (Tuesday, 10 March)
• Re: review of document-overview (Tuesday, 10 March)
• Re: draft responses for LC comment FH3/29 (Tuesday, 10 March)
• Re: draft responses for LC comment FH3/29 (Monday, 9 March)
• Re: draft responses for LC comment FH3/29 (Monday, 9 March)
• Re: draft responses for LC comment FH3/29 (Monday, 9 March)
• Re: draft responses for LC comment FH3/29 (Monday, 9 March)
• Re: LC responses 28, 48 & 58 (Monday, 9 March)
• Re: draft responses for LC comment FH3/29 (Monday, 9 March)
• Re: A description of the changes necessary to implement named data ranges (Monday, 9 March)
• Re: CURIE is a rec (Monday, 9 March)
• Re: draft response for LC comment 63 JO1 (Friday, 6 March)
• Re: New responses ready to go [for Agenda TC 11/03/2009] (Friday, 6 March)
• Re: Wiki madness (Friday, 6 March)
• Re: unhappy responses (Friday, 6 March)
• Re: A description of the changes necessary to implement named data ranges (Friday, 6 March)
• Re: [LC Response] To Ivan Herman Re: tiny editorial comment (Thursday, 5 March)
• Re: Draft for the response to LC comment 58 (fully typed functional-style syntax) (Wednesday, 4 March)
• Re: Draft for the response to LC comment 58 (fully typed functional-style syntax) (Wednesday, 4 March)
• Re: draft response for LC comment 63 JO1 (Wednesday, 4 March)
• Re: [Fwd: US clocks move to Summer Time Sunday, 8 March] (Tuesday, 3 March)
• [Fwd: US clocks move to Summer Time Sunday, 8 March] (Tuesday, 3 March)
• Re: Implemented Resolution of LC Comment 34 (TQ) on property chains in RDF-Based Semantics (Tuesday, 3 March)

Jie Bao

• Re: ACTION-308 Review QRG (Tuesday, 24 March)
• Re: Response to Andy Seaborne's comments on rdf:text (Tuesday, 17 March)
• ACTION-301 Contact Andy Seaborn (Thursday, 5 March)
• Re: Response to Andy Seaborne's comments on rdf:text (Thursday, 5 March)

Jim Hendler

• Re: Document Overview published (Friday, 27 March)
• Re: [LC response] To Jim Hendler (was Re: Fwd: Question re: HasKey entailments) (Monday, 23 March)
• Re: LC responses 28, 48 & 58 (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: unhappy responses (Thursday, 5 March)

Jonathan Rees

• Re: OWL naming issues (Tuesday, 24 March)
• syntax/semantics confusion in 'Syntax' document (Monday, 23 March)
• Determining the type of an IRI for OWL 2 Full represented in structural specification (Monday, 23 March)

Markus Krötzsch

• Re: Preliminary Review of "Conformance and Test Cases" (as of 20 March 2009) (Wednesday, 25 March)

Michael Schneider

• RE: RDF-Based Semantics ready for WG-internal Review (Tuesday, 31 March)
• RE: RDF-Based Semantics ready for WG-internal Review (Tuesday, 31 March)
• RDF-Based Semantics ready for WG-internal Review (Sunday, 29 March)
• RE: I've just replaced CURIEs with the SPARQL abbreviation mechanism (Saturday, 28 March)
• RE: order of editors in Overview references (Friday, 27 March)
• RE: OWL naming issues (Wednesday, 25 March)
• Drafted response to LC-Comment 52a (JR6a) (Wednesday, 25 March)
• RE: draft response for 52b / JR6b (Tuesday, 24 March)
• RE: Suggestion to change RDF encoding of HasKey axioms [RE: I've implemented the change to the syntax of HasKey] (Monday, 23 March)
• RE: Suggestion to change RDF encoding of HasKey axioms [RE: I've implemented the change to the syntax of HasKey] (Saturday, 21 March)
• RE: Suggestion to change RDF encoding of HasKey axioms [RE: I've implemented the change to the syntax of HasKey] (Saturday, 21 March)
• Suggestion to change RDF encoding of HasKey axioms [RE: I've implemented the change to the syntax of HasKey] (Friday, 20 March)
• RE: Jan Wielemaker is o.k. I think (Thursday, 19 March)
• RE: A problem with HasKey in the functional-style syntax (Thursday, 19 March)
• RE: [LC Response] To Michael Schneider Re: Declaration( Datatype( DT ) ) (Wednesday, 18 March)
• RE: A problem with HasKey in the functional-style syntax (Wednesday, 18 March)
• RE: would a semantics by any other name look as formal? (Monday, 16 March)
• FYI: started to draft answer to LC 52a (Monday, 16 March)
• Missing "." at end of last sentence in "Acknowledgements" section (Monday, 16 March)
• RE: Datatype definitions implemented (Monday, 16 March)
• RE: Changes to the spec that were decided at the F2F are done (Monday, 16 March)
• RE: Draft second response for LC Comment 51a RM1-2 (Thursday, 12 March)
• RE: LC responses 28, 48 & 58 (Thursday, 12 March)
• RE: draft response for LC comment 8 MS2 (Thursday, 12 March)
• RE: Proposed response to LC call 12 (Theorem PR1) (Thursday, 12 March)
• draft response to LC 58 concerning OWL Full [RE: FYI - unresolved LC Comments] (Thursday, 12 March)
• RE: completed draft response for LC comment 21 JDB2 (Thursday, 12 March)
• RE: draft response for LC comment 8 MS2 (Thursday, 12 March)
• RE: Datatype disjointness implemented (Thursday, 12 March)
• RE: draft response for 52b / JR6b (Thursday, 12 March)
• RE: links to bibliography (Thursday, 12 March)
• RE: draft response for LC comment 65 MS8 (Wednesday, 11 March)
• RE: LC responses 28, 48 & 58 (Wednesday, 11 March)
• RE: draft response for LC comment 64 MS7 (Tuesday, 10 March)
• RE: LC responses 28, 48 & 58 (Tuesday, 10 March)
• RE: unhappy responses (Monday, 9 March)
• RE: draft response for LC comment 8 MS2 (Monday, 9 March)
• RE: CURIE is a rec (Monday, 9 March)
• RE: normative and non-normative references (Monday, 9 March)
• RE: draft responses for LC comment FH3/29 (Monday, 9 March)
• RE: draft responses for LC comment FH3/29 (Monday, 9 March)
• RE: normative and non-normative references (Monday, 9 March)
• RE: normative and non-normative references (Friday, 6 March)
• LC comment 51/1: unsatisfied with our response (Friday, 6 March)
• Some trivial errors fixed in Document Overview and Roadmap (Friday, 6 March)
• RE: draft response for LC comment 65 MS8 (Friday, 6 March)
• RE: A description of the changes necessary to implement named data ranges (Friday, 6 March)
• RE: OWL2 comments -> UC#3 (Friday, 6 March)
• RE: unhappy responses (Thursday, 5 March)
• RE: unhappy responses (Thursday, 5 March)
• RE: partial response for LC comment 21 JDB2 (Wednesday, 4 March)
• RE: partial response for LC comment 21 JDB2 (Tuesday, 3 March)
• RE: Implemented Resolution of LC Comment 34 (TQ) on property chains in RDF-Based Semantics (Monday, 2 March)
• Declaration( Datatype( DT ) ) (Sunday, 1 March)

Michel Dumontier

• Re: OWL2 comments -> UC#3 (Tuesday, 3 March)
• Re: OWL2 comments -> UC#3 (Monday, 2 March)
• Re: OWL2 comments -> UC#3 (Monday, 2 March)

Mike Smith

• Review of Manchester Syntax Document (Tuesday, 31 March)
• Re: Preliminary Review of "Conformance and Test Cases" (as of 20 March 2009) (Tuesday, 24 March)
• Re: Preliminary Review of "Conformance and Test Cases" (as of 20 March 2009) (Friday, 20 March)
• Re: Changes to the spec that were decided at the F2F are done (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Comment on NF&R Applicability of Use Case References (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Comment on NF&R Appendix: Use Cases - Literature v. References (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: proposed changes to Document Overview (Wednesday, 11 March)
• ACTION-283 completed: tests modified, drafted content for errata (Wednesday, 11 March)

Peter F. Patel-Schneider

• general review of NF&R (Monday, 30 March)
• Re: Quick comments on the QRG (Monday, 30 March)
• review of rdf:text (Monday, 30 March)
• review of Document Overview (Monday, 30 March)
• Re: Quick comments on the QRG (Monday, 30 March)
• review of RDF-Based Semantics (Monday, 30 March)
• review of RDF-Based Semantics (Monday, 30 March)
• [LC Response] To Alan Ruttenberg Re: Last call comment - conformance/datatype map (Wednesday, 25 March)
• Re: draft response for 52b / JR6b (Tuesday, 24 March)
• Re: Determining the type of an IRI for OWL 2 Full represented in structural specification (Tuesday, 24 March)
• Re: draft response for 52b / JR6b (Monday, 23 March)
• Re: Several minor problems in the grammar for the functional-style syntax (Sunday, 22 March)
• Re: Preliminary Review of "Conformance and Test Cases" (as of 20 March 2009) (Friday, 20 March)
• Preliminary Review of "Conformance and Test Cases" (as of 20 March 2009) (Friday, 20 March)
• Re: Jan Wielemaker is o.k. I think (Thursday, 19 March)
• Re: [LC Response] To Zhe Wu Re: OWL 2 LC Comments (Wednesday, 18 March)
• [LC Response] To Zhe Wu Re: OWL 2 LC Comments - Addendum (Wednesday, 18 March)
• [LC Response] To Michael Schneider Re: Declaration( Datatype( DT ) ) (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: new draft response for LC comment 66 AR1 (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: new draft response for LC comment 66 AR1 (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: JM1 response in today's agenda (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: LC comments 18, 19, 59 (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Re: Closing action-306: Comments on the QRG (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Quick comments on the QRG (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Re: Closing action-306: Comments on the QRG (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Re: draft response for LC comment 20 JDB1 (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Re: draft response for LC comment 63 JO1 (Monday, 16 March)
• Re: draft response for LC comment 63 JO1 (Monday, 16 March)
• Re: draft response for LC comment 63 JO1 (Monday, 16 March)
• Re: draft response for LC comment 20 JDB1 (Monday, 16 March)
• would a semantics by any other name look as formal? (Friday, 13 March)
• new draft response for LC comment 66 AR1 (Friday, 13 March)
• Re: Draft second response for LC Comment 51a RM1-2 (Friday, 13 March)
• abstract of NF&R (Thursday, 12 March)
• Draft second response for LC Comment 51a RM1-2 (Thursday, 12 March)
• Re: Draft Response for LC Comment 22 MSM1 (Thursday, 12 March)
• FYI - unresolved LC Comments (Thursday, 12 March)
• response for 21 JDB2 (was Re: GIF in W3C documents ) (Thursday, 12 March)
• Re: draft response for LC comment 8 MS2 (Thursday, 12 March)
• Re: draft responses for LC comments JC1a and JC1b/34 et al (Thursday, 12 March)
• Re: draft response for LC comment 66 AR1 (Thursday, 12 March)
• Re: Datatype disjointness implemented (Thursday, 12 March)
• Re: draft response for 52b / JR6b (Thursday, 12 March)
• Re: LC responses 28, 48 & 58 (Thursday, 12 March)
• lack of progress on LC responses (Thursday, 12 March)
• completed draft response for LC comment 21 JDB2 (Thursday, 12 March)
• GIF in W3C documents (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Draft Response for LC Comment 22 MSM1 (Wednesday, 11 March)
• draft response for LC comment 24 RIF1 (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: draft response for LC comment 8 MS2 (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: links to bibliography (Wednesday, 11 March)
• new draft LC response for 62 (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: draft response for LC comment 65 MS8 (Wednesday, 11 March)
• new draft LC response for 51b (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: LC responses 28, 48 & 58 (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: LC responses 28, 48 & 58 (Wednesday, 11 March)
• draft response for 52b / JR6b (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Minutes for TC 2008-03-11 (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: review of document-overview (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: changes to document overview (done) (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: changes to document overview (done) (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: Response draft for Jan Wielemaker JR8-2/54 (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: draft response for LC comment 64 MS7 (Wednesday, 11 March)
• proposed changes to Document Overview (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: LC responses 28, 48 & 58 (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: Agenda for TC 2009-03-11 - Note meeting 1 hour earlier than usual in Europe due to daylight saving time differences (Tuesday, 10 March)
• Re: Agenda for TC 2008-03-11 - Note meeting 1 hour earlier than usual in Europe due to daylight saving time differences (Tuesday, 10 March)
• agenda for TC 11 March 2009 - NOTE TIME CHANGE IN Europe!!! (Tuesday, 10 March)
• Re: Response draft for Jan Wielemaker JR8-2/54 (Tuesday, 10 March)
• Re: Response draft for Jan Wielemaker JR8-2/54 (Tuesday, 10 March)
• Re: Response draft for Jan Wielemaker JR8-2/54 (Tuesday, 10 March)
• Re: review of document-overview (Tuesday, 10 March)
• Re: review of document-overview (Tuesday, 10 March)
• Re: draft responses for LC comment FH3/29 (Monday, 9 March)
• Re: draft responses for LC comment FH3/29 (Monday, 9 March)
• Re: draft responses for LC comment FH3/29 (Monday, 9 March)
• Re: draft responses for LC comment FH3/29 (Monday, 9 March)
• Re: normative and non-normative references (Monday, 9 March)
• Re: draft responses for LC comment FH3/29 (Monday, 9 March)
• Re: The issue of syntax productions within the NF&R document (Saturday, 7 March)
• Re: The issue of syntax productions within the NF&R document (Saturday, 7 March)
• Re: normative and non-normative references (Saturday, 7 March)
• CURIE is a rec (Friday, 6 March)
• Re: draft responses for LC comments JC1a and JC1b/34 et al (Friday, 6 March)
• Re: draft responses for LC comment FH3/29 (Friday, 6 March)
• Re: A description of the changes necessary to implement named data ranges (Friday, 6 March)
• Re: draft response for LC comment 63 JO1 (Friday, 6 March)
• Re: The issue of syntax productions within the NF&R document (Thursday, 5 March)
• Re: The issue of syntax productions within the NF&R document (Thursday, 5 March)
• Manchester syntax updated for datatype definitions (Thursday, 5 March)
• Re: A description of the changes necessary to implement named data ranges (Thursday, 5 March)
• Wiki madness (Thursday, 5 March)
• Re: draft response to LC comment 60/JC2 (Thursday, 5 March)
• unhappy responses (Thursday, 5 March)
• Re: draft response for LC comment 64 MS7 (Thursday, 5 March)
• draft response for LC comment 65 MS8 (Thursday, 5 March)
• [LC Response] To Ivan Herman Re: tiny editorial comment (Wednesday, 4 March)
• New responses ready to go [for Agenda TC 11/03/2009] (Wednesday, 4 March)
• [LC Response] To Zhe Wu Re: OWL 2 LC Comments (Wednesday, 4 March)
• [LC Response] To Zhe Wu Re: OWL 2 LC Comments (Wednesday, 4 March)
• [LC Comment] To Bijan Parsia Re: LC Comment: "Hidden" Axioms (Wednesday, 4 March)
• "comment" on XSD 1.1 Part 2: Datatypes (Wednesday, 4 March)
• draft response for LC comment 63 JO1 (Wednesday, 4 March)
• Re: draft response for LC comment 8 MS2 (Wednesday, 4 March)
• Re: partial response for LC comment 21 JDB2 (Wednesday, 4 March)
• draft response for LC comment 66 AR1 (Wednesday, 4 March)
• draft response for LC comment 20 JDB1 (Wednesday, 4 March)
• Re: draft response for 43b ZW3b (Tuesday, 3 March)
• Re: Draft Response to LC comment 49/JR4 (Tuesday, 3 March)

Rinke Hoekstra

• ?Double affilation (Thursday, 26 March)
• Versions and Imports in NF&R, and syntactic stuff. (Friday, 20 March)
• Re: NF&R update (Friday, 20 March)
• Re: Jan Wielemaker is o.k. I think (Friday, 20 March)
• NF&R and OWL 1 use cases (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Reference to Document Overview in LC responses (Wednesday, 18 March)
• JM1 response in today's agenda (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: NF&R update (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: review of document-overview (Tuesday, 10 March)
• Re: The issue of syntax productions within the NF&R document (Thursday, 5 March)

Sandro Hawke

• Re: Acknowlegment glitch (Tuesday, 31 March)
• order of editors in Overview references (Friday, 27 March)
• Document Overview published (Friday, 27 March)
• Re: Jan Wielemaker is o.k. I think (Thursday, 19 March)
• scribe conventions (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: Proposal for use of labels in Manchester Syntax ISSUE-146, ACTION-247 (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Re: ambiguity in XML Schema (Tuesday, 17 March)
• ambiguity in XML Schema (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Re: CURIEs in OWL/XML (Saturday, 14 March)
• proposal for bibliography handling (Friday, 13 March)
• Re: GIF in W3C documents (Thursday, 12 March)
• Re: proposed changes to Document Overview (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: changes to document overview (done) (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: review of document-overview (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: Response draft for Jan Wielemaker JR8-2/54 (Wednesday, 11 March)
• links to bibliography (Wednesday, 11 March)
• changes to document overview (done) (Wednesday, 11 March)
• how we refer to SSFSS (not urgent) (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: US / UK dialect in OWL docs (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: Response draft for Jan Wielemaker JR8-2/54 (Tuesday, 10 March)
• Re: Response draft for Jan Wielemaker JR8-2/54 (Tuesday, 10 March)
• Re: Response draft for Jan Wielemaker JR8-2/54 (Tuesday, 10 March)
• review of document-overview (Tuesday, 10 March)
• a different approach to OWL/XML (was: draft responses for LC comment FH3/29) (Monday, 9 March)
• Re: CURIE is a rec (Saturday, 7 March)

Seaborne, Andy

• RE: Response to Andy Seaborne's comments on rdf:text (Monday, 16 March)

Uli Sattler

• Re: RDF-Based Semantics ready for WG-internal Review (Monday, 30 March)

Zhe Wu

• Minutes for TC 2008-03-25 (Tuesday, 31 March)
• Re: [LC Response] To Zhe Wu Re: OWL 2 LC Comments (Thursday, 19 March)
• Re: [LC Response] To Zhe Wu Re: OWL 2 LC Comments - Addendum (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: Datatype disjointness implemented (Thursday, 12 March)
• Re: [LC Response] To Zhe Wu Re: OWL 2 LC Comments (Thursday, 5 March)
• Re: [LC Response] To Zhe Wu Re: OWL 2 LC Comments (Wednesday, 4 March)
• Re: draft response for 43b ZW3b (Monday, 2 March)

Last message date: Tuesday, 31 March 2009 20:30:05 UTC