- From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 22:03:31 +0000
- To: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org
Looks good -- thanks. Ian On 11 Mar 2009, at 21:18, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > Draft Response for LC Comment 62] JM1 > > Dear Jonas, > > Thank you for your message > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/2009Feb/ > 0010.html> > on the OWL 2 Web Ontology Language last call drafts. > > Your comment is related to another last-call comment > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/2009Jan/ > 0059.html> > and this response is the essentially same as the relevant portion > of the > response to that comment, archived at > .................... > > > In sum, you were not missing the fact that it was not possible to name > datatypes. Instead, we were. We have now added this capability to > OWL 2. > Thank you for bringing our oversight to our attention. > > > Please acknowledge receipt of this email to > <mailto:public-owl-comments@w3.org> (replying to this email should > suffice). In your acknowledgment please let us know whether or not you > are satisfied with the working group's response to your comment. > > Regards, > Peter F. Patel-Schneider > on behalf of the W3C OWL Working Group >
Received on Monday, 16 March 2009 22:04:09 UTC