- From: Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de>
- Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 13:34:32 +0100
- To: "Boris Motik" <boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Cc: "W3C OWL Working Group" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <0EF30CAA69519C4CB91D01481AEA06A0011326B3@judith.fzi.de>
Hi! Looks good to me, and it also looks to me that everything is well for the DL/Full correspondence. Michael >-----Original Message----- >From: public-owl-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-owl-wg-request@w3.org] >On Behalf Of Boris Motik >Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 1:28 PM >To: 'W3C OWL Working Group' >Subject: A description of the changes necessary to implement named data >ranges > >Hello, > >Here is a description of how the named data range extension would work. >In >short, we'd introduce a new type of axioms called DatatypeDefinition. >These >would allow you to define a datatype as having some built-in value. >Then, you >would be able to write something like this: > >(1) Declaration( Datatype( a:myDT ) ) >(2) DatatypeDefinition( a:myDT DatatypeRestriction( xsd:integer ... ) ) > >Note that (1) is necessary because without it, axiom (2) alone would >invalidate >the typing constraints (it would use a URI that is not properly typed). >These >axioms would be mapped into RDF into (3) and (4), respectively: > >(3) a:myDT rdf:type rdfs:Datatype >(4) a:myDT a:equivalentClass ... > > >We would call datatypes occurring in such axioms '''defined'''. To >obtain a >logic with favorable computational properties, in OWL 2 DL we'd have the >following conditions: > >- If the axiom closure contains a datatype declaration, then the >datatype MUST >be in the datatype map or the axiom closure MUST contain a datatype >definition >for the datatype. > >- A datatype definition axiom MUST NOT define a datatype that is in the >datatype >map. > >- Datatype definitions MUST be acyclic. > >- Datatype restrictions MUST involve only datatypes from the datatype >map - that >is, the datatypes defined through datatype definition axioms have no >facets. > > > >All these changes would be reflected in the Syntax document. The impact >to all >other documents would be quite small: > >- Changes to RDF Mapping are minimal and involve mapping the new axiom >(into RDF >and back); both changes are minimal. > >- Changes to Direct Semantics are minimal and involve defining the >semantics of >the new axiom. > >- Changes to the XML Syntax are minimal and involve adding a new axiom. > >- There are no changes to the RDF-Based Semantics. > >Regards, > > Boris > -- Dipl.-Inform. Michael Schneider Research Scientist, Dept. Information Process Engineering (IPE) Tel : +49-721-9654-726 Fax : +49-721-9654-727 Email: michael.schneider@fzi.de WWW : http://www.fzi.de/michael.schneider ======================================================================= FZI Forschungszentrum Informatik an der Universität Karlsruhe Haid-und-Neu-Str. 10-14, D-76131 Karlsruhe Tel.: +49-721-9654-0, Fax: +49-721-9654-959 Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts, Az 14-0563.1, RP Karlsruhe Vorstand: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Rüdiger Dillmann, Dipl. Wi.-Ing. Michael Flor, Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Wolffried Stucky, Prof. Dr. Rudi Studer Vorsitzender des Kuratoriums: Ministerialdirigent Günther Leßnerkraus =======================================================================
Received on Friday, 6 March 2009 12:35:17 UTC