Agenda for TC 2008-03-11 - Note meeting 1 hour earlier than usual in Europe due to daylight saving time differences

Following is tomorrow's agenda. As usual on the web at
http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Teleconference.2009.03.11/Agenda

Regards,
Alan

Agenda
  Admin
   Roll call
   Agenda amendments?
   PROPOSED: Accept [http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/meeting/2009-03-04
Previous Minutes (4 March)]
   Action items status
    Pending Review Actions
     Action|281	Send out a response to XML Schema after the f2f /
Peter Patel-Schneider
     Action|295	Prepare a reply to comment 20 / Boris Motik
     Action|301	Contact Andy Seaborn and try to make sure he's happy
with our work on rdf:text, and will talk to use about any remaining
issues / Jie Bao
     Action|298	Make fixes for 61 and craft response / Ian Horrocks
     Action|305	Tell us how much naming of datatypes would cost /
Peter Patel-Schneider
     Action|303	Flesh out the response to 58 / Ian Horrocks
     Action|304	Craft the response to 28 and 48 / Ian Horrocks
     Action|300	Send wg apology to jim re: initial version of
http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/LC_Responses/JH1 / Alan Ruttenberg
    Due and overdue Actions]
     Action|270	Add new examples in response to IH1 / Boris Motik
     Action|292	Talk to RIF to see what datatypes in OWL must not be
in OWL-RL / Sandro Hawke
     Action|299	Find and fix the to-wiki-links Jeremy complains about
/ Sandro Hawke
     Action|283	Add an ontology header and a comment to each of the
test cases from WebOnt that are prevented from being syntactically OWL
2 DL only be the absence of this header and create content for errata
on webont tests / Michael Smith
  Datatypes
   Draft Proposal:  OWL 2 datatypes will have disjointness as in XML
Schema (i.e., the datatypes xsd:string, xsd:boolean, owl:real,
xsd:float, xsd:double, xsd:dateTimeStamp, xsd:hexBinary,
xsd:base64Binary, and xsd:anyURI are pairwise disjoint), as requested
in LC Comments [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/2009Jan/0027.html
22] and [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/2009Jan/0031.html
24].
    Currently xsd:string, xsd:boolean, owl:real, xsd:dateTimeStamp,
xsd:hexBinary, and xsd:anyURI are pairwise disjoint.  This separates
out xsd:float, xsd:double, and xsd:base64Binary.
   Draft Proposal: Remove the datatype owl:realPlus from OWL 2, as it
was introduced to unify floats, doubles, and other numbers.
   Proposal:  Add named datatypes to OWL 2 - one definition per
datatype not in the datatype map, acyclic, as per
[http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2009Mar/0066.html
email] from Boris and mentioned in LC Comments
[http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/2009Jan/0059.html
51] and [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/2009Feb/0010.html
62].
  Plans documents
   Status of ongoing changes to Syntax
   Status of rdf:text
   Quick Reference Guide - Solicitation for reviewers
   Document Overview -Proposed: Publish FPWD
   New Features and Rationale - getting ready for LC publication in mid-April?
   ManchesterSyntax|Manchester Syntax - ready for publication in mid-April?
   Data Range Extension: Linear Equations - ready for publication in mid-April?
   RDF-Based Semantics - ready for LC publication in mid-April?
  Last Call Comments (see
[http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/public-owl-comments]
and  Responses_to_Last_Call_Comments|Responses to Last Call Comments)
   Responses ready to send - for quick approval
    LC_Responses/JDB1|JDB1 20 OWL 2 RL datatypes
    LC_Responses/FH2|FH2 28 OWL 2 vs OWL 2 DL
    LC_Responses/SWD1|SWD1 48 OWL 2 vs OWL 2 DL / too few triples
    LC_Responses/MH1|MH1 58 strong typing of functional syntax
    LC_Responses/JO1|JO1 63 status of XML Syntax
    LC_Responses/MS7|MS7 64 syntactic conformance for OWL 2 DL
   Draft responses for discussion and potential approval
    LC_Responses/FH3|FH3 29 concerning XML syntax
    LC_Responses/JC1a|JC1a 34a TopQuadrant high-level comments
    LC_Responses/JC1b|JC1b 34b TopQuadrant detailed comments
    LC_Responses/MS8|MS8 65 datatype declaration
   Responses being drafted and/or awaiting document editing actions
    LC_Responses/JDB2|JDB2 21 Various mostly editorial (partly drafted)
    LC_Responses/JR6b|JR6b 52b OWL 2 DL definition
   Comments that may require policy decisions
    LC_Responses/RIF1|RIF1 24,LC_Responses/MSM1|MSM1 22 Disjoint
numeric datatypes
    LC_Responses/RM1|RM1 51,LC_Responses/JM1|JM1 62 Naming datatypes
   Work in progress blocking sending of responses
    GRDDL LC_Responses/TM1|TM1 17,LC_Responses/JC1b|JC1b 34b
    New Property Chain syntax LC_Responses/JC1b|JC1b 34b
    Changes to XML syntax LC_Responses/BP2|BP2 40
   Other responses that should be moving forward
    LC_Responses/IH1|IH1 9 OWL 2 DL Global Constraints example
    LC_Responses/BM1|BM1 12 OWL 2 RL Theorem PR1
    LC_Responses/ML1|ML1 18,LC_Responses/MZ1|MZ1 19 OWL 2 QL
Explanation and Changes
   Non-positive Acknowledgments
    LC_Responses/MK1|MK1 47 Functional properties for keys see
[http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2009Mar/0152.html
followup]
    LC_Responses/JR8-2|JR8-2 54 Only one exchange syntax (second
reply) [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/2009Feb/0018.html
Our first response],
[http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/2009Mar/0000.html
response to response], [http://www.w3.org/mid/30583.1236613609@ubehebe
Sandro's comment]
    LC_Responses/RM1|RM1 51(a) Data properties should be functional
  Test Cases
   Problems with approved test cases?
   Progress on tool support, e.g., for "species validation"?
   How to organize related tests - e.g. same input but different
results for DL versus Full/RL (e.g. punning/sameas)
   PROPOSED: Approve some/all of the test cases currently in the
Test_Queue|test queue
  Coordination with RIF
   Organization
   LC comments on rdf:text
   Datatypes - Sandro update
  Features "At-Risk" (just a reminder)
   owl:rational support
   xsd:decimal precision
   owl:dateTime name
   rdf:XMLLiteral support
   OWL 2 RL Datatypes
  Additional other business

Regrets
  Ian Horrocks

Call in details
  Date of Call: Wednesday March 11, 2009
  Time of Call:
[http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/?year=2009&month=03&day=11&hour=17&min=0&sec=0
1700 UTC], 10:00 (West US), 13:00 (East US), 17:00 (London), 18:00
(Paris) NOTE CHANGE!!!
  Dial-In #: +1.617.761.6200 (Cambridge, MA)
  Dial-In #: +33.4.89.06.34.99 (Nice, France)
  Dial-In #: +44.117.370.6152 (Bristol, UK)
  Participant Access Code: 69594# (OWLWG)
  IRC Channel: irc.w3.org port 6665 channel #owl ([irc:irc.w3.org:6665/owl])
  Web-based IRC (member-only): http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc
(Firefox IRC addon: [https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/16
chatzilla])
  Duration: 90 minutes
  Chair: Alan Ruttenberg
  Scribe: Jeff_Z._Pan|Jeff Pan (Scribe_List|Scribe List)
  Link to Agenda:
http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Teleconference.2009.03.11/Agenda

Received on Tuesday, 10 March 2009 17:42:56 UTC