- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2009 19:13:00 -0500 (EST)
- To: schneid@fzi.de
- Cc: ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk, public-owl-wg@w3.org
Normative means that you depend on the document, non-normative means that the document just gives background. I would divide your references as follows: Normative CURIE OWL 2 SS&FS - because of datatypes RDF Concepts - because of RDF graphs RDF Semantic - duh! RDF:Text RFC 2119 RFC 3987 Non-normative Direct Semantics ! RDF Mapping ! - because Section 7 is informative OWL S&AS RFC 2396 From: "Michael Schneider" <schneid@fzi.de> Subject: RE: normative and non-normative references Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 00:27:45 +0100 > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: public-owl-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-owl-wg-request@w3.org] >>On Behalf Of Ian Horrocks >>Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 11:54 PM >>To: W3C OWL Working Group >>Subject: normative and non-normative references >> >>Peter has updated Manchester Syntax to distinguish normative and non- >>normative references [1]. >> >>Can other editors please do the same. > > Hi! > > I wonder if any of the references in the RDF-Based Semantics > > <http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/RDF-Based_Semantics#References> > > is non-normative. What are the criteria for normative vs. non-normative > references? > > I would like to avoid having any non-normative refs in the RDF-Based > Semantics, if possible, and so I would prefer to not make this distinction > in the document. > > Michael
Received on Saturday, 7 March 2009 00:23:22 UTC