Re: draft response for LC comment 20 JDB1

Gone.

peter


From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: draft response for LC comment 20 JDB1
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 00:42:57 -0400

> Ian points out, (and I just checked) that float an double are part of
> RL now. So the section I was concerned about
> 
> "Implementation difficulties have resulted in xsd:float and xsd:double
> remaining out of OWL 2 RL.  If these difficulties can be overcome the
> two datatypes may be included in OWL 2 RL.  If changes occurs the
> working group will notify you."
> 
> can just be omitted.
> 
> -Alan
> 
> 
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider
> <pfps@research.bell-labs.com> wrote:
>> I'm not sure why this is relevant to the reply.  We have removed the
>> incorrect rationale and extended the collection of OWL 2 RL datatypes,
>> in response to the point brought up by Jos.
>>
>> However, if you have suggestions for changes to the wording of the
>> reply, feel free to propose same.
>>
>> peter
>>
>>
>> From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
>> Subject: Re: draft response for LC comment 20 JDB1
>> Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 14:27:34 -0400
>>
>>> Hi Peter,
>>>
>>> I think a few words about, or pointer to a discussion of the
>>> implementation issues that are relevant to OWL RL in this response
>>> should be added.
>>>
>>> -Alan
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 9:28 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider
>>> <pfps@research.bell-labs.com> wrote:
>>>> [Draft Response for LC Comment 20:] JDB1
>>>>
>>>> Dear Jos,
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for your message
>>>>  <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/2009Jan/0022.html>
>>>> on the OWL 2 Web Ontology Language last call drafts.
>>>>
>>>> You are correct that OWL 2 RL does not need the intersection of
>>>> datatypes to be empty or infinite.  Accordingly the datatypes in OWL 2
>>>> RL have been adjusted to include all the OWL datatypes that are
>>>> restrictions of xsd:decimal and xsd:string and also xsd:boolean.
>>>>
>>>> In response to another comment
>>>>  <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2009Jan/0083.html>
>>>> on the difficulty of implementing datatypes in rules systems,
>>>> owl:real and owl:rational have been removed from OWL 2 RL.
>>>> This possibility was mentioned in Feature At Risk #2.
>>>>
>>>> The diffs for these changes can be found at
>>>> http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/index.php?title=Profiles&diff=18687&oldid=18109
>>>>
>>>> Implementation difficulties have resulted in xsd:float and xsd:double
>>>> remaining out of OWL 2 RL.  If these difficulties can be overcome the
>>>> two datatypes may be included in OWL 2 RL.  If changes occurs the
>>>> working
>>>> group will notify you.
>>>>
>>>> Please acknowledge receipt of this email to
>>>> <mailto:public-owl-comments@w3.org> (replying to this email should
>>>> suffice). In your acknowledgment please let us know whether or not you
>>>> are satisfied with the working group's response to your comment.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Peter F. Patel-Schneider
>>>> on behalf of the W3C OWL Working Group
>>>>
>>>>
>>

Received on Tuesday, 17 March 2009 12:53:50 UTC