- From: Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de>
- Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 00:32:49 +0100
- To: "Ian Horrocks" <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Cc: "OWL Working Group WG" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <0EF30CAA69519C4CB91D01481AEA06A0011329E7@judith.fzi.de>
Hi Ian! >-----Original Message----- >From: public-owl-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-owl-wg-request@w3.org] >On Behalf Of Ian Horrocks >Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 10:36 AM >To: OWL Working Group WG >Subject: draft response for LC comment 64 MS7 > >Dear Michael, > >Thank you for your comment > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2009Feb/ >0256.html> >on the OWL 2 Web Ontology Language last call drafts. > >Thank you for pointing out this problem. The Syntactic Conformance >section of the Conformance and Test Cases document (see [1]) has been >revised to be clearer in general and to rectify this error in >particular -- it now explicitly refers to RDF/XML documents and says: > >"An OWL 2 DL ontology document is an OWL 2 Full ontology document >that can be successfully parsed using the canonical parsing process >as defined in the OWL 2 Syntax specification [OWL 2 Specification] >and the procedure for mapping from RDF graphs to the structural >specification described in the OWL 2 Mapping to RDF Graphs [OWL 2 >Mapping to RDF Graphs] to produce an instance of the OWL 2 ontology >class satisfying all of the restrictions described in Section 3 of >the OWL 2 Syntax specification [OWL 2 Specification]." The text for OWL 2 DL documents now looks fine to me. >Note that in response to other last call comments Section 3 of the >OWL 2 Syntax specification is being revised to ensure that it lists >all the restrictions that apply to OWL DL ontology structures. And that's ok, too. However, looking into the Conformance document, there seems to be an error now in all other definitions. For example: <http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Conformance_and_Test_Cases#Syntactic_Confor mance> "An OWL 2 EL ontology document is an OWL 2 DL ontology where" Shouldn't it say: "... is an OWL 2 DL ontology *document* where" ? Ditto for QL and RL Cheers, Michael > >[1] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/ >Conformance_and_Test_Cases#Syntactic_Conformance > >Please acknowledge receipt of this email to <mailto:public-owl- >comments@w3.org> (replying to this email should suffice). In your >acknowledgment please let us know whether or not you are satisfied >with the working group's response to your comment. > >Regards, >Ian Horrocks >on behalf of the W3C OWL Working Group > > -- Dipl.-Inform. Michael Schneider Research Scientist, Dept. Information Process Engineering (IPE) Tel : +49-721-9654-726 Fax : +49-721-9654-727 Email: michael.schneider@fzi.de WWW : http://www.fzi.de/michael.schneider ======================================================================= FZI Forschungszentrum Informatik an der Universität Karlsruhe Haid-und-Neu-Str. 10-14, D-76131 Karlsruhe Tel.: +49-721-9654-0, Fax: +49-721-9654-959 Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts, Az 14-0563.1, RP Karlsruhe Vorstand: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Rüdiger Dillmann, Dipl. Wi.-Ing. Michael Flor, Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Wolffried Stucky, Prof. Dr. Rudi Studer Vorsitzender des Kuratoriums: Ministerialdirigent Günther Leßnerkraus =======================================================================
Received on Tuesday, 10 March 2009 23:33:34 UTC