- From: Héctor Pérez-Urbina <hector.perez-urbina@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 17:23:15 +0000
- To: "OWL 1.1" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Hi,
This is a preliminary version of this week's teleconference:
* Admin
o Roll call
o Agenda amendments?
o PROPOSED: Accept Previous Minutes (11 March)
o Action items status
+ Pending Review Actions
# Action 270 Add new examples in response to IH1
/ Boris Motik
# Action 283 Add an ontology header and a
comment to each of the test cases from WebOnt that are prevented from
being syntactically OWL 2 DL only be the absence of this header and
create content for errata on webont tests / Michael Smith
# Action 302 Prepare a reply to comment 22 /
Peter Patel-Schneider
+ Due and overdue Actions
# Action 292 Talk to RIF to see what datatypes
in OWL must not be in OWL-RL / Sandro Hawke
# Action 300 Send wg apology to Jim re: initial
version of http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/LC_Responses/JH1 / Alan
Ruttenberg
# Action 301 Contact Andy Seaborn and try to
make sure he's happy with our work on rdf:text, and will talk to use
about any remaining issues / Jie Bao
# Action 299 Find and fix the to-wiki-links
Jeremy complains about / Sandro Hawke
# Action 308 Review QRG / Bijan Parsia
# Action 306 Review QRG / Ivan Herman
# Action 309 Review QRG / Bernardo Cuenca Grau
* Documents
o Under Review
+ Quick Reference Guide
o Ready for review?
+ Structural Specification and Functional-Style Syntax
+ Mapping to RDF Graphs
+ Direct Semantics
+ RDF-Based Semantics
+ Conformance and Test Cases
+ Profiles
+ New Features and Rationale
+ Manchester Syntax
o Status?
+ Status of rdf:text
+ XML Serialization
+ Data Range Extension: Linear Equations - ready for
publication in mid-April?
* OWL 2 RL Datatypes
o PROPOSED: add xsd:float and xsd:double to datatypes
supported in OWL RL (see Zhe's email)
* Last Call Comments (see [1] and Responses to Last Call Comments)
o Responses ready to send - for quick approval
+ MS2 8 Facet space
+ JDB2 21 Various editorial
+ MSM1 22 Non disjoint XSD datatypes
+ RIF1 24 Non disjoint XSD datatypes
+ FH2 28 OWL 2 vs OWL 2 DL
+ FH3 29 concerning XML syntax
+ JR2 33 SSFSS Editorial comments
+ JR3 44 Structures, elements of the structural
specification, and equivalence
+ SWD1 48 OWL 2 vs OWL 2 DL / too few triples
+ RM1a 51a Functional datatype properties
+ RM1b 51b Datatype Restriction RDF-Syntax & Named
Datatype Restrictions
+ JR6b 52b OWL 2 DL definition
+ JR8-2 54 Triples and OWL
+ MH1 58 strong typing of functional syntax
+ JC2 60 Syntactic conformance
+ JM1 62 naming of datatypes
+ JO1 63 status of XML Syntax
+ MS7 64 syntactic conformance for OWL 2 DL
+ MS8 65 datatype declaration
o Draft responses for discussion and potential approval
+ JDB1 20 OWL 2 RL datatypes
+ JC1a 34a TopQuadrant high-level comments
+ JC1b 34b TopQuadrant detailed comments
+ BP2 40 Restructuring XML Schema (Bijan has new Schema)
+ AR1 66 Datatype map conformance
o Work in progress blocking sending of responses
+ GRDDL TM1 17,JC1b 34b
o Other responses that should be moving forward
+ ML1 18, MZ1 19, IH1 59 OWL 2 QL Explanation and Changes
o Non-positive Acknowledgments
+ MK1 47 Functional properties for keys see Bijan's
comment, notes from followup with Marijke
+ JR8-2 54 Only one exchange syntax (second reply) Our
first response, response to response, Sandro's comment
+ RM1 51(a) Data properties should be functional
* Test Cases
o Problems with approved test cases?
o Progress on tool support, e.g., for "species validation"?
o How to organize related tests - e.g. same input but
different results for DL versus Full/RL (e.g. punning/sameas)
o PROPOSED: Approve some/all of the test cases currently in
the test queue
* Coordination with RIF
o Organization
o LC comments on rdf:text
o Datatypes - Sandro update
* Features "At-Risk" (just a reminder)
o owl:rational support
o xsd:decimal precision
o owl:dateTime name
o rdf:XMLLiteral support
o OWL 2 RL Datatypes
* Additional other business
Regards,
Héctor
Received on Tuesday, 17 March 2009 17:23:55 UTC