- From: Héctor Pérez-Urbina <hector.perez-urbina@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 17:23:15 +0000
- To: "OWL 1.1" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Hi, This is a preliminary version of this week's teleconference: * Admin o Roll call o Agenda amendments? o PROPOSED: Accept Previous Minutes (11 March) o Action items status + Pending Review Actions # Action 270 Add new examples in response to IH1 / Boris Motik # Action 283 Add an ontology header and a comment to each of the test cases from WebOnt that are prevented from being syntactically OWL 2 DL only be the absence of this header and create content for errata on webont tests / Michael Smith # Action 302 Prepare a reply to comment 22 / Peter Patel-Schneider + Due and overdue Actions # Action 292 Talk to RIF to see what datatypes in OWL must not be in OWL-RL / Sandro Hawke # Action 300 Send wg apology to Jim re: initial version of http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/LC_Responses/JH1 / Alan Ruttenberg # Action 301 Contact Andy Seaborn and try to make sure he's happy with our work on rdf:text, and will talk to use about any remaining issues / Jie Bao # Action 299 Find and fix the to-wiki-links Jeremy complains about / Sandro Hawke # Action 308 Review QRG / Bijan Parsia # Action 306 Review QRG / Ivan Herman # Action 309 Review QRG / Bernardo Cuenca Grau * Documents o Under Review + Quick Reference Guide o Ready for review? + Structural Specification and Functional-Style Syntax + Mapping to RDF Graphs + Direct Semantics + RDF-Based Semantics + Conformance and Test Cases + Profiles + New Features and Rationale + Manchester Syntax o Status? + Status of rdf:text + XML Serialization + Data Range Extension: Linear Equations - ready for publication in mid-April? * OWL 2 RL Datatypes o PROPOSED: add xsd:float and xsd:double to datatypes supported in OWL RL (see Zhe's email) * Last Call Comments (see [1] and Responses to Last Call Comments) o Responses ready to send - for quick approval + MS2 8 Facet space + JDB2 21 Various editorial + MSM1 22 Non disjoint XSD datatypes + RIF1 24 Non disjoint XSD datatypes + FH2 28 OWL 2 vs OWL 2 DL + FH3 29 concerning XML syntax + JR2 33 SSFSS Editorial comments + JR3 44 Structures, elements of the structural specification, and equivalence + SWD1 48 OWL 2 vs OWL 2 DL / too few triples + RM1a 51a Functional datatype properties + RM1b 51b Datatype Restriction RDF-Syntax & Named Datatype Restrictions + JR6b 52b OWL 2 DL definition + JR8-2 54 Triples and OWL + MH1 58 strong typing of functional syntax + JC2 60 Syntactic conformance + JM1 62 naming of datatypes + JO1 63 status of XML Syntax + MS7 64 syntactic conformance for OWL 2 DL + MS8 65 datatype declaration o Draft responses for discussion and potential approval + JDB1 20 OWL 2 RL datatypes + JC1a 34a TopQuadrant high-level comments + JC1b 34b TopQuadrant detailed comments + BP2 40 Restructuring XML Schema (Bijan has new Schema) + AR1 66 Datatype map conformance o Work in progress blocking sending of responses + GRDDL TM1 17,JC1b 34b o Other responses that should be moving forward + ML1 18, MZ1 19, IH1 59 OWL 2 QL Explanation and Changes o Non-positive Acknowledgments + MK1 47 Functional properties for keys see Bijan's comment, notes from followup with Marijke + JR8-2 54 Only one exchange syntax (second reply) Our first response, response to response, Sandro's comment + RM1 51(a) Data properties should be functional * Test Cases o Problems with approved test cases? o Progress on tool support, e.g., for "species validation"? o How to organize related tests - e.g. same input but different results for DL versus Full/RL (e.g. punning/sameas) o PROPOSED: Approve some/all of the test cases currently in the test queue * Coordination with RIF o Organization o LC comments on rdf:text o Datatypes - Sandro update * Features "At-Risk" (just a reminder) o owl:rational support o xsd:decimal precision o owl:dateTime name o rdf:XMLLiteral support o OWL 2 RL Datatypes * Additional other business Regards, Héctor
Received on Tuesday, 17 March 2009 17:23:55 UTC