- From: Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@deri.org>
- Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 12:13:45 +0000
- To: Boris Motik <boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- CC: 'W3C OWL Working Group' <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Boris Motik a écrit : > [...] > Note that this is *exactly* the same problem as the one we have with xsd:decimal > and xsd:double; hence, I consider it really strange to use one solution for > numerics but a completely different one for dates. I agree. And for consistency, it would be reasonable to adopt this change, IMHO. > [...] > - Nobody (such as RIF) can scorn us for going our way: we can always point to > XML Schema and say "Here is the holy bible!" The Bible is all about interpretation ;-) Regards, -- Antoine Zimmermann Postdoctoral researcher at: Digital Enterprise Research Institute National University of Ireland, Galway IDA Business Park Lower Dangan Galway, Ireland antoine.zimmermann@deri.org http://zimmer.aprilfoolsreview.com/
Received on Friday, 13 March 2009 12:14:29 UTC