- From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 19:00:43 +0000
- To: Mike Smith <msmith@clarkparsia.com>
- Cc: W3C OWL Working Group <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
This is clearly a problem. Has it been addressed? Ian On 11 Mar 2009, at 18:51, Mike Smith wrote: > I looked at the use case used to motivate OWL 2 declarations [1] and > am confused about the goal of the references. > > One reference is a document about mediation of DIG 2 and DIG 1.x [2]. > The referenced document says nothing about declarations and, > consequently, I find the reference confusing in this context. > > Similarly, the OWLAPI reference [3] does not mention declarations. > > The TOOLS and SYNTAX PROBLEM references are broken links, so I was > unable to evaluate their applicability. > > I have not performed a similar audit on the other references in this > appendix, but extrapolating from this case I'm concerned about the > applicability of references throughout this appendix. > -- > Mike Smith > > Clark & Parsia > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/ > New_Features_and_Rationale#Use_Case_.2317_-_Tools_developers_. > 5BTools.5D > [2] http://www.webont.org/owled/2007/PapersPDF/submission_11.pdf > [3] http://www.webont.org/owled/2007/PapersPDF/submission_32.pdf >
Received on Sunday, 15 March 2009 19:01:19 UTC