- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:37:52 +0000
- To: W3C OWL Working Group <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Oops, Two missing bits. 1) We need a way to indicate that something is to be expanded. Either safe CURIEs (boo), ad hoc safe CURIEs (e.g., <Class IRI="@bjp:Person"/ >) or some non-scheme leading character) or a distinct attribute, or "if it's not declared it's an IRI" . I'm tending toward ad hoc. <http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3987.txt> says: scheme = ALPHA *( ALPHA / DIGIT / "+" / "-" / "." ) So, there are a lot of characters that would work fine. @ seems reasonable to me. ^ is ok. *. Whatever. 2) We need to detail the expansion model. Which is easy enough. We just need to be clear on the empty prefix. Cheers, Bijan.
Received on Monday, 23 March 2009 09:34:09 UTC