- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:45:37 +0000
- To: Jie Bao <baojie@cs.rpi.edu>
- CC: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>, Boris Motik <boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk>, W3C OWL Working Group <public-owl-wg@w3.org>, "Reynolds, Dave Everett" <dave.reynolds@hp.com>, "public-rdf-text@w3.org" <public-rdf-text@w3.org>
Jie Bao wrote: > Dear Andy Seaborne. > > Thank you for your response. I incorporated them in the wiki-version > of the rdf:text document. The version is at > * http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/index.php?title=InternationalizedStringSpec&oldid=18720 We have reviewed the document with respect to the changes we suggested - thank you for incorporating them. The use of "existing" in section 3 does not seem to add anything. Indeed, any future serialization that has built-in language tagging would presumable also use the usual RDF form. As we are agreed on the intent of the abbreviation of rdf:text, we suggest that adding an explicit statement about the intent would be helpful: suggestion: Sec 3.2: """ The effect of these abbreviations is that there will be no occurrence of an RDF literal with datatype "rdf:text" in RDF generated by an OWL 2 or RIF processor. This maximises compatibility with RDF toolsets. """ This would be especially helpful because in the RDF Syntax specification it says, referring to the rdf:namespace: http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-syntax-grammar-20040210/#section-Namespace 5.1 The RDF Namespace and Vocabulary """ Any other names are not defined and SHOULD generate a warning when encountered, but should otherwise behave normally. """ Andy -------------------------------------------- Hewlett-Packard Limited Registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN Registered No: 690597 England
Received on Monday, 16 March 2009 21:46:58 UTC