- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 12:34:14 +0000
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: W3C OWL Working Group <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
On 17 Mar 2009, at 12:31, Sandro Hawke wrote: [snip] > I don't disagree with any of that. > > I suggest we leave it at this: if someone sees a place where they > believe folks could reasonably mis-understand XML Schema (with respect > to OWL), they should propose one or more test cases to clarify the > matter. *If* we end up approving some test cases like that, then > we'll > consider whether some clarifying text is needed somewhere (in our > specs > or in XML schema specs.) As we should for all our specs :) > Good enough? Indeed, but, as I say, not really XML Schema specific. Cheers, Bijan.
Received on Tuesday, 17 March 2009 12:34:48 UTC