- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:36:31 -0400 (EDT)
- To: dlm@ksl.stanford.edu
- Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org
All of my current comments are in my preliminary review of QRG - follow this email thread back to my review message or follow the link on the WG Reviewing page (http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Reviewing) or see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2009Mar/0360.html As I said, some of the suggestions need considerable change to the document. These will need another round of reviewing. I agree with Bijan that a LC publication of the document should include the compact layout version of the document. peter From: "Deborah L. McGuinness" <dlm@ksl.stanford.edu> Subject: Re: Quick comments on the QRG Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:56:55 -0400 > Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: >> My review comments on the QRG guide will require quite extensive changes >> for it to be suitable for LC status. I worry about the changes being >> made in time for a re-review in time for publication on 15 April. >> >> On the other hand, I don't see any problem with publishing the QRG in an >> interim form on 15 April, nor do I see any particular problem in the QRG >> going to LC status a bit later, and then catching up with the core >> documents, particularly as QRG will not need a CR phase. >> >> peter >> >> > I would like QRG to be published along the same schedule with the other > documents so at worst, i would like to see an interim publication form > if we are not in a position to publish the final form. I would prefer > not to have the quick ref go later to last call then the other documents > if we can avoid it. > We are integrating the other comments now. can we have some of your > comments now if we can not get all of them now? > > thanks, > Deborah >
Received on Monday, 30 March 2009 23:34:55 UTC