keys and format

Hi Bijan

1. Could you please provide us with the expected text to complete the
Keys section see:
Ed Note(CG) something about class scope; something about multi-keys
[Perhaps using the reusing key scenario] ?

2. Sorry for the delay of response, find below more details about the
"format" issue that you had raised. As said in the general email I
hope  that the changes for the UC section now better addresses your
concerns.

* I had carefuly checked the format (and content) of table [1] ("that
you  provided in november 2008 to "show a format for the use cases
that you liked" -
before closing your Action early november."
In  fact, this table provided as an example was a table from OWLED
2007, if I don't mistake, which content and format were difficult to
exploit as it for NF&R.
Netherheless the 2 tables provided in section 3 of NF&R have a quite
similar format (transposing lines and columns) and flavor.
* We have also separated the UCs bibliography, specific to the UCs,
from other references, which is indeed better. It stands  now in the
UCs Appendix.
* It has also been discussed in the WG,  though I really cannot
remember when and even if it’s recorded, that having 'dynamic' UCs was
not really possible or perhaps not wished. Furthermore, we had also
discussed it with the chairs off-line, quite a long time ago, that it
was not realistic or fruitful to make changes that would require to
re-read all the OWLED series papers and summarize them, specially at
this stage of advancement.
* We have also insisted in present version  that the given UCs are
illustrative (used to illustrate a specific feature of OWL 2)  and
that they are only a few among many that motivated the extensions, to
prevent any confusion.

In conclusion, I hope that given those changes, having only tables in
section 3 of NF&R in the main documen with hyperlinks to an Appendix
as agreed at the Mandelieu F2F  makes the job. Though it is not
exactly what  you had  ideally wished, it does not seem so far.

[1] "In other words, I'd rather have something closer to:
<http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pTmcCXR-dV6TdDo24Tse-fQ>"


Chrisine



-- 
Christine

Received on Wednesday, 18 March 2009 08:35:24 UTC