- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 20:49:45 -0400 (EDT)
- To: schneid@fzi.de
- Cc: ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk, public-owl-wg@w3.org
From: "Michael Schneider" <schneid@fzi.de> Subject: RE: draft response for LC comment 64 MS7 Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 00:32:49 +0100 > Hi Ian! > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: public-owl-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-owl-wg-request@w3.org] >>On Behalf Of Ian Horrocks >>Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 10:36 AM >>To: OWL Working Group WG >>Subject: draft response for LC comment 64 MS7 >> >>Dear Michael, [...] > However, looking into the Conformance document, there seems to be an error > now in all other definitions. For example: > > > <http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Conformance_and_Test_Cases#Syntactic_Confor > mance> > > "An OWL 2 EL ontology document is an OWL 2 DL ontology where" > > Shouldn't it say: > > "... is an OWL 2 DL ontology *document* where" > > ? Looks right to me. Fixed. > Ditto for QL and RL > > Cheers, > Michael peter
Received on Wednesday, 11 March 2009 00:49:08 UTC