- From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:20:56 -0400
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org
Thanks for pointing that out - an oversight. Regarding your previous email about extra email pointers, thank for reviewing this. For future reference, I assume that people will follow a thread so I don't list all followups explicitly. I'll review them and add any that aren't in thread to the agenda. Regards, Alan On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com> wrote: > On 3 March 2009, a full week ago, I proposed a reply > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2009Mar/0032.html > for LC Comment 66 > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2009Feb/0272.html > > There have been no negative comments on this reply. > > I think that, therefore, the reply should at least be in the "Draft > responses for discussion and potential approval" section of the agenda > for the 11 March 2009 TC. > > > Peter F. Patel-Schneider > Bell Labs Research > >
Received on Tuesday, 10 March 2009 19:21:33 UTC