Re: draft response for LC comment 63 JO1

Thanks Peter. This is the type of extra text I was thinking about, but
your English is way better than mine:-)

Ivan

Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
> Subject: Re: draft response for LC comment 63 JO1
> Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 17:11:58 +0100
> 
>> Just a small note:
>>
>> Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
>> [snip]
>>> syntaxes, even though that document only defines one syntax.  The
>>> Working group does not intend to make changes to the XML Serialization
>>> document in response to your message.
>> I seem to remember that we did discuss the possibility of clarifying the
>> status of OWL/XML with respect to others in the status part of the
>> OWL/XML specification (which is the only 'change' the Jacco is
>> explicitly asking for). Ie, I am not 100% this last statement is correct
>> in the answer...
>>
>> Ivan
> 
> We could start the XML Serialization document out something like:
> 
> 
> This document defines the XML syntax for OWL 2, an alternative exchange
> syntax for OWL 2 designed for use by XML tools (e.g., tools using, for
> example, XQuery [XQuery]).  Although this XML syntax is designed as an
> exchange syntax for OWL 2, RDF/XML remains the primary exchange syntax
> for OWL---use of this syntax by OWL 2 tools is optional.
> 
> This syntax mirrors the
> structural specification of OWL 2 [OWL 2 Specification] and is defined
> by means of an XML schema [XML Schema], which is available as part of
> this document. The XML schema has been obtained by a straightforward
> translation of the structural specification of the OWL 2 Specification
> [OWL 2 Specification] in the following way:  
> 
> 
> If no one complains, I'll change the response to Jacco and edit the XML
> Serialization document.
> 
> peter

-- 

Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf