Re: Agenda TC 18/03/2009

Hm. JR8-2 appears both under 'Responses ready to send - for quick
approval' as well as 'Non-positive Acknowledgments'

As far as I can remember and trace it back on the mailing list, we
indeed did have a discussion with Sandro, and I did make some changes to
include his opinion. The last mail I found on the matter from Sandro
was: 'I can live with it. Ship it!'[1]. Ie, I believe JR8-2 should be
under 'Responses ready to send - for quick approval'. But I may have
missed something in the avalanche of mails...

Ivan


[1] http://www.w3.org/mid/6080.1236776272@ubehebe

Héctor Pérez-Urbina wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> This is a preliminary version of this week's teleconference:
> 
>     *  Admin
>           o Roll call
>           o Agenda amendments?
>           o PROPOSED: Accept Previous Minutes (11 March)
>           o Action items status
>                 + Pending Review Actions
>                       # Action 270 Add new examples in response to IH1
> / Boris Motik
>                       # Action 283 Add an ontology header and a
> comment to each of the test cases from WebOnt that are prevented from
> being syntactically OWL 2 DL only be the absence of this header and
> create content for errata on webont tests / Michael Smith
>                       # Action 302 Prepare a reply to comment 22 /
> Peter Patel-Schneider
>                 + Due and overdue Actions
>                       # Action 292 Talk to RIF to see what datatypes
> in OWL must not be in OWL-RL / Sandro Hawke
>                       # Action 300 Send wg apology to Jim re: initial
> version of http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/LC_Responses/JH1 / Alan
> Ruttenberg
>                       # Action 301 Contact Andy Seaborn and try to
> make sure he's happy with our work on rdf:text, and will talk to use
> about any remaining issues / Jie Bao
>                       # Action 299 Find and fix the to-wiki-links
> Jeremy complains about / Sandro Hawke
>                       # Action 308 Review QRG / Bijan Parsia
>                       # Action 306 Review QRG / Ivan Herman
>                       # Action 309 Review QRG / Bernardo Cuenca Grau
>     * Documents
>           o Under Review
>                 + Quick Reference Guide
>           o Ready for review?
>                 + Structural Specification and Functional-Style Syntax
>                 + Mapping to RDF Graphs
>                 + Direct Semantics
>                 + RDF-Based Semantics
>                 + Conformance and Test Cases
>                 + Profiles
>                 + New Features and Rationale
>                 + Manchester Syntax
>           o Status?
>                 + Status of rdf:text
>                 + XML Serialization
>                 + Data Range Extension: Linear Equations - ready for
> publication in mid-April?
>     * OWL 2 RL Datatypes
>           o PROPOSED: add xsd:float and xsd:double to datatypes
> supported in OWL RL (see Zhe's email)
>     * Last Call Comments (see [1] and Responses to Last Call Comments)
>           o Responses ready to send - for quick approval
>                 + MS2 8 Facet space
>                 + JDB2 21 Various editorial
>                 + MSM1 22 Non disjoint XSD datatypes
>                 + RIF1 24 Non disjoint XSD datatypes
>                 + FH2 28 OWL 2 vs OWL 2 DL
>                 + FH3 29 concerning XML syntax
>                 + JR2 33 SSFSS Editorial comments
>                 + JR3 44 Structures, elements of the structural
> specification, and equivalence
>                 + SWD1 48 OWL 2 vs OWL 2 DL / too few triples
>                 + RM1a 51a Functional datatype properties
>                 + RM1b 51b Datatype Restriction RDF-Syntax & Named
> Datatype Restrictions
>                 + JR6b 52b OWL 2 DL definition
>                 + JR8-2 54 Triples and OWL
>                 + MH1 58 strong typing of functional syntax
>                 + JC2 60 Syntactic conformance
>                 + JM1 62 naming of datatypes
>                 + JO1 63 status of XML Syntax
>                 + MS7 64 syntactic conformance for OWL 2 DL
>                 + MS8 65 datatype declaration
>           o Draft responses for discussion and potential approval
>                 + JDB1 20 OWL 2 RL datatypes
>                 + JC1a 34a TopQuadrant high-level comments
>                 + JC1b 34b TopQuadrant detailed comments
>                 + BP2 40 Restructuring XML Schema (Bijan has new Schema)
>                 + AR1 66 Datatype map conformance
>           o Work in progress blocking sending of responses
>                 + GRDDL TM1 17,JC1b 34b
>           o Other responses that should be moving forward
>                 + ML1 18, MZ1 19, IH1 59 OWL 2 QL Explanation and Changes
>           o Non-positive Acknowledgments
>                 + MK1 47 Functional properties for keys see Bijan's
> comment, notes from followup with Marijke
>                 + JR8-2 54 Only one exchange syntax (second reply) Our
> first response, response to response, Sandro's comment
>                 + RM1 51(a) Data properties should be functional
>     * Test Cases
>           o Problems with approved test cases?
>           o Progress on tool support, e.g., for "species validation"?
>           o How to organize related tests - e.g. same input but
> different results for DL versus Full/RL (e.g. punning/sameas)
>           o PROPOSED: Approve some/all of the test cases currently in
> the test queue
>     * Coordination with RIF
>           o Organization
>           o LC comments on rdf:text
>           o Datatypes - Sandro update
>     * Features "At-Risk" (just a reminder)
>           o owl:rational support
>           o xsd:decimal precision
>           o owl:dateTime name
>           o rdf:XMLLiteral support
>           o OWL 2 RL Datatypes
>     * Additional other business
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Héctor
> 

-- 

Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf