- From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 18:06:33 +0000
- To: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: schneid@fzi.de, public-owl-wg@w3.org
Thanks to Michael for picking up and Peter for fixing this error. Ian On 11 Mar 2009, at 00:49, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > From: "Michael Schneider" <schneid@fzi.de> > Subject: RE: draft response for LC comment 64 MS7 > Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 00:32:49 +0100 > >> Hi Ian! >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: public-owl-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-owl-wg- >>> request@w3.org] >>> On Behalf Of Ian Horrocks >>> Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 10:36 AM >>> To: OWL Working Group WG >>> Subject: draft response for LC comment 64 MS7 >>> >>> Dear Michael, > > [...] > >> However, looking into the Conformance document, there seems to be >> an error >> now in all other definitions. For example: >> >> >> <http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/ >> Conformance_and_Test_Cases#Syntactic_Confor >> mance> >> >> "An OWL 2 EL ontology document is an OWL 2 DL ontology where" >> >> Shouldn't it say: >> >> "... is an OWL 2 DL ontology *document* where" >> >> ? > > Looks right to me. Fixed. > >> Ditto for QL and RL >> >> Cheers, >> Michael > > peter
Received on Sunday, 15 March 2009 18:07:10 UTC