- From: Rinke Hoekstra <hoekstra@uva.nl>
- Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 09:34:58 +0100
- To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
- Cc: W3C OWL Working Group <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
I just walked over to Jan's office to confirm the ACK-OK status of his answer, but he wasn't in. In fact, he won't be reachable for the coming two months: he will be cycling in Namibia (and South Africa, and perhaps Botswana as well). ... but I interpret his response as an ACK-OK as well. -Rinke ----------------------------------------------- Drs. Rinke Hoekstra Email: hoekstra@uva.nl Skype: rinkehoekstra Phone: +31-20-5253497 Web: http://www.leibnizcenter.org/users/rinke Visit: Kloveniersburgwal 48, room ET1.09c Leibniz Center for Law, Faculty of Law University of Amsterdam, PO Box 1030 1000 BA Amsterdam, The Netherlands ----------------------------------------------- On 19 mrt 2009, at 22:35, Bijan Parsia wrote: > On 19 Mar 2009, at 20:55, Michael Schneider wrote: > >> Me too. > > I agree as well. I think it's good to try to make people happy, but > that's not the groups job at this point. > >> And I think that neither of the two proposed approaches could be >> seen as a >> serious replacement for OWL/XML. > > +1 > > [snip] >> This doesn't mean that I disregard Jan's basic idea of having one >> basic >> serialization syntax for RDF, and then extend it for the different >> SemWeb >> languages. I only believe that it won't help us (or POWDER, or ...) >> too >> much, in particular not with RDF/XML(-ABBREV) as the base language. > > Sandro suggested this as well, and seems to have some ideas in this > area. I'm pretty skeptical, but I'll be happy to see proposals. But > I think they'd need a lot of vetting and experience before we could > rely on them. > > It's also contra the current trend. GRDDL, for all its horrific, > disfiguring, oozy warts, starts from the point of view that XML has > it's advantages and that it's better *not* to try to displace it, > but to work with it. That's what I like about it. The warts...not so > much :) > > Cheers, > Bijan.
Received on Friday, 20 March 2009 08:35:32 UTC