- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 00:59:13 -0400
- To: public-owl-wg@w3.org
You can see a color-coded diff of everyone's changes since the F2F here: http://www.w3.org/People/Sandro/document_overview_changes.html (it rather bizarrely comes out looking like a wiki page...) I didn't do exactly what I said I'd do, but I hope it's close enough. I think I did two things Peter didn't want: adding a table of syntaxes and a Venn diagram of profiles. I figured we can decide about them at the meeting more easily if we can see what they look like in the document. I'm not particularly attached to the table of syntaxes, but I do think the Venn diagram will really help people feel more comfortable with the profiles. I also added a section "Modifications", which has only: Editor's Note: This section needs to be filled in carefully, enumerating all the cases where an OWL 1 ontology will have different semantics in OWL 2. The narrowness of the cases is expected to underscore the degree to which OWL 2 is substantially compatible with OWL 1. I'm fine leaving it like that for now, but I feel pretty strongly we need to provide this text by LC. I didn't make any of Christine's changes. I'm ambivalent about most of them. In some cases -- like linking to the Wiki vs linking to the TR -- I'm deeply conflicted, with strong feelings, but I really don't know the right answer, so I could live with it either way. Anyway, I'm happy with the document going to FPWD now (with or without the syntax table, with the links/references all made consistant). I understand if folks don't have enough time to review it before the meeting -- I guess we'll see how it goes. -- Sandro
Received on Wednesday, 11 March 2009 04:59:21 UTC