- From: Mike Smith <msmith@clarkparsia.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:51:09 -0400
- To: W3C OWL Working Group <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
I looked at the use case used to motivate OWL 2 declarations [1] and am confused about the goal of the references. One reference is a document about mediation of DIG 2 and DIG 1.x [2]. The referenced document says nothing about declarations and, consequently, I find the reference confusing in this context. Similarly, the OWLAPI reference [3] does not mention declarations. The TOOLS and SYNTAX PROBLEM references are broken links, so I was unable to evaluate their applicability. I have not performed a similar audit on the other references in this appendix, but extrapolating from this case I'm concerned about the applicability of references throughout this appendix. -- Mike Smith Clark & Parsia [1] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/New_Features_and_Rationale#Use_Case_.2317_-_Tools_developers_.5BTools.5D [2] http://www.webont.org/owled/2007/PapersPDF/submission_11.pdf [3] http://www.webont.org/owled/2007/PapersPDF/submission_32.pdf
Received on Wednesday, 11 March 2009 18:51:49 UTC