- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 09:52:21 +0000
- To: Christine Golbreich <cgolbrei@gmail.com>
- Cc: W3C OWL Working Group <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
On 25 Mar 2009, at 11:13, Christine Golbreich wrote: > Status (2nd paragraph) > -------------- > - it would be better tro have Syntax first and Primer next, since it's > a guide to the different documents and Syntax has normative content. > - suggested sentence like: > -> The Quick Reference Guide provides links into other documents that > it is intended to complement, particularly the Syntax document for > more details of syntax, the OWL 2 Primer for examples, and the New > Features and Rationale document for the new features of OWL 2 . > > Structure of the document > --------------------------------- > I'm not convinced by the proposed strutcuration. Since QRG is a guide > to other documents (IMO) It is not my understanding that the QRG has anything to do with other documents, at least, in its primary purpose. The purpose of the QRG is to be a simple, one page, doublesided reference card/cheat sheet. It was directly modeled on: http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/_file_directory_/resources/94.pdf I would vigorously oppose any scope creep or retargeting. I hope this clarifies matters for you, Christine. I don't know if this information changes your review in any way, but if the restructuring is based on a misunderstanding of the purpose of the QRG, then I would urge reconsideration of that feedback. Cheers, Bijan.
Received on Friday, 27 March 2009 09:52:58 UTC