Re: Quick comments on the QRG

• From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
• Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:06:11 -0400 (EDT)
• To: public-owl-wg@w3.org
• Message-Id: <20090330.170611.80315519.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>

My review comments on the QRG guide will require quite extensive changes
for it to be suitable for LC status.  I worry about the changes being
made in time for a re-review in time for publication on 15 April.

On the other hand, I don't see any problem with publishing the QRG in an
interim form on 15 April, nor do I see any particular problem in the QRG
going to LC status a bit later, and then catching up with the core
documents, particularly as QRG will not need a CR phase.

peter

Received on Monday, 30 March 2009 21:04:27 UTC