- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:20:07 -0400 (EDT)
- To: public-owl-wg@w3.org
Review of "Document Overview" General: Very close to being suitable for LC. Abstract: I don't see any need for the "part 1 of <very large number>" section of the abstract. 1/ Introductio:n Add: "This document provides a high-level overview of OWL 2 and serves as a roadmap for the documents that define and describe OWL 2." 2/ Overview: Could remove the subsection headers, as the subsections are all very short. Change "Note that many users ... could ..." to "Most users ... would ...". Figure 1: RDF-Based Semantics Remove EdNote on GRDDL. 2.2/ Syntaxes: Remove "It must be emphasized, ...." as it just repeats stuff from the previous paragraph. The table just repeats stuff from Figure 1 - remove it. 2.3/ Semantics: Add to end of third paragraph: ''OWL 2 Full'' is used informally to refer to RDF graphs considered as OWL 2 ontologies and interpreted using the RDF-based semantics. Maybe add (although I don't think that it is necessary): ''OWL 2 DL'' is used informally to refer to OWL 2 DL ontologies interpreted using the direct semantics. 2.4/ Profiles: Remove Figure 2, as it serves no useful purpose. 3/ Differences Could remove the subsection headers, as the subsections are all very short. Change "albeit under a possibly different name." to "albeit possibly under different names." Remove "; it also has a formal equivalence to UML [UML]." This is just *wrong*. 3.2: Just put this stuff elsewhere (perhaps in Primer). 4/ Roadmap All names of documents should link to the document. Remove the editor's note, as we expect everything to be a WD this time. Document Overview. A guide to the OWL 2 documents and a high-level overview of OWL 2. Replace the Note: with "(WG Note)" in the two appropriate lines.
Received on Monday, 30 March 2009 21:18:29 UTC