- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:37:21 +0100
- To: W3C OWL Working Group <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
On 30 Mar 2009, at 22:20, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > The parts of the document that the OWL spec depends on appear to be > fine > to me. However, the function part of the document has several > unresolved > issues, mostly having to do with details of the various functions that > RIF wants to define over rdf:text. > > I suggest that the document be published along with our other > documents > so that we have a complete set of documents. We will say that > Sections > 1-4 should be treated as last call, and that OWL does not depend on > Section 5 of the document. Is there any reason that section 5 should be in rdf:text? Isn't the case that, in general, RIF defines its functions in a document separate from the datatype definitions? Cheers, Bijan.
Received on Monday, 30 March 2009 21:37:58 UTC