- From: Héctor Pérez-Urbina <hector.perez-urbina@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 16:24:45 +0000
- To: "OWL 1.1" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Hi,
This is a preliminary version of this week's teleconference:
* Admin
o Roll call
o Agenda amendments?
o PROPOSED: Accept Previous Minutes (18 March)
o Action items status
+ Pending Review Actions
# Action 270 Add new examples in response to IH1
/ Boris Motik
# Action 301 Contact Andy Seaborn and try to
make sure he's happy with our work on rdf:text, and will talk to use
about any remaining issues / Jie Bao
# Action 283 Add an ontology header and a
comment to each of the test cases from WebOnt that are prevented from
being syntactically OWL 2 DL only be the absence of this header and
create content for errata on webont tests / Michael Smith
# Action 309 Review QRG / Bernardo Cuenca Grau
# Action 308 Review QRG / Bijan Parsia
# Action 323 Help Sandro / Bijan Parsia
+ Due and overdue Actions
# Action 292 Talk to RIF to see what datatypes
in OWL must not be in OWL-RL / Sandro Hawke
# Action 299 Find and fix the to-wiki-links
Jeremy complains about / Sandro Hawke
# Action 310 Review rdf:text document
http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/InternationalizedStringSpec / Peter
Patel-Schneider
# Action 307 Review QRG / Christine Golbreich
# Action 321 Review NF&R (perhaps after some
editing) / Elisa Kendall
* Documents and Reviewing
o All documents should now be ready for review
+ With exception of (at least) rdf:text!
o Appendices on "Changes since Last Call"?
o All documents now have [reviewers assigned] and eager to start work
* Last Call Comments (see [1] and Responses to Last Call Comments)
o Responses ready to send - for quick approval
+ ML1 18 QL typos/extension
+ MZ1 19 QL comments
+ IH3 59 QL sameAs
# Related: Ivan's comment suggesting additional
QL intro text
+ BP2 40 XML syntax
+ JR6a 52a RDF Semantics editorial
+ JR6b 52b OWL 2 DL definition
+ AR1 66 Datatype map conformance thread
o Draft responses for discussion and potential approval
+ GRDDL TM1 17 GRDDL
o Non-positive Acknowledgments
+ MK1 47 Functional properties for keys see Bijan's
comment, notes from followup with Marijke
+ RM1 51(a) Data properties should be functional (2nd
reply sent 18th March)
* (Technical) Issues Arising
o Treatment of xsd:dateTimeStamp (see SS&FS and thread)
+ PROPOSED: OWL will use the standard XML Schema
definition of xsd:dateTimeStamp (i.e., time zones are carried into the
semantics of OWL).
o CURIEs (see thread)
+ PROPOSED: OWL will send comments on CURIEs spec
+ PROPOSED: OWL will not rely on CURIEs spec but will
define it's own IRI abbreviation mechanism compatible with the one
used by SPARQL (see proposal)
o Naming scheme for OWL
o Differences between OWL 1 and OWL 2 -- where should they
be documented? (NF&R or Primer)
* Open Issues potentially affecting Last Call
o Issue 146 Specify use of labels in addition to/instead of
entity URIs in serialization
+ PROPOSED: Schedule vote for next week (1st April) to
close this issue.
* Test Cases
o PROPOSED: Don't use :DL and :FULL as tags for semantics
o Problems with approved test cases?
o Progress on tool support, e.g., for "species validation"?
o How to organize related tests - e.g. same input but
different results for DL versus Full/RL (e.g. punning/sameas)
o PROPOSED: Approve some/all of the test cases currently in
the test queue
* Features "At-Risk" (just a reminder)
o owl:rational support
o rdf:XMLLiteral support
* Additional other business
Regards,
Héctor
Received on Tuesday, 24 March 2009 16:25:25 UTC