- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 10:04:45 +0100
- To: Rinke Hoekstra <hoekstra@uva.nl>
- CC: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.manchester.ac.uk>, W3C OWL Working Group <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <49C35C2D.1070407@w3.org>
I had another round of private mail with Jan yesterday and I think we are fine as far as the LC is concerned. Ivan Rinke Hoekstra wrote: > I just walked over to Jan's office to confirm the ACK-OK status of his > answer, but he wasn't in. In fact, he won't be reachable for the coming > two months: he will be cycling in Namibia (and South Africa, and perhaps > Botswana as well). > > ... but I interpret his response as an ACK-OK as well. > > -Rinke > > ----------------------------------------------- > Drs. Rinke Hoekstra > > Email: hoekstra@uva.nl Skype: rinkehoekstra > Phone: +31-20-5253497 > Web: http://www.leibnizcenter.org/users/rinke > Visit: Kloveniersburgwal 48, room ET1.09c > > Leibniz Center for Law, Faculty of Law > University of Amsterdam, PO Box 1030 > 1000 BA Amsterdam, The Netherlands > ----------------------------------------------- > > On 19 mrt 2009, at 22:35, Bijan Parsia wrote: > >> On 19 Mar 2009, at 20:55, Michael Schneider wrote: >> >>> Me too. >> >> I agree as well. I think it's good to try to make people happy, but >> that's not the groups job at this point. >> >>> And I think that neither of the two proposed approaches could be seen >>> as a >>> serious replacement for OWL/XML. >> >> +1 >> >> [snip] >>> This doesn't mean that I disregard Jan's basic idea of having one basic >>> serialization syntax for RDF, and then extend it for the different >>> SemWeb >>> languages. I only believe that it won't help us (or POWDER, or ...) too >>> much, in particular not with RDF/XML(-ABBREV) as the base language. >> >> Sandro suggested this as well, and seems to have some ideas in this >> area. I'm pretty skeptical, but I'll be happy to see proposals. But I >> think they'd need a lot of vetting and experience before we could rely >> on them. >> >> It's also contra the current trend. GRDDL, for all its horrific, >> disfiguring, oozy warts, starts from the point of view that XML has >> it's advantages and that it's better *not* to try to displace it, but >> to work with it. That's what I like about it. The warts...not so much :) >> >> Cheers, >> Bijan. > > -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Friday, 20 March 2009 09:04:36 UTC